Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 vs Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black has 35 mm more width than the ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (112 mm vs 77 mm). The Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black has 85 mm more depth than the ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (162 mm vs 77 mm). The Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black has 43.5 mm more height than the ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (61.5 mm vs 18 mm). Storage media type: SSD on the ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2, HDD, SSD on the Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black. Storage drive interface: M.2 on the ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2, Serial ATA III on the Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black.

Storage media type
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:SSD
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:HDD, SSD
Storage drive interface
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:M.2
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:Serial ATA III
Storage drive sizes supported
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:M.2
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:2.5,3.5"
Width
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:77 mm
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:112 mm
Depth
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:77 mm
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:162 mm
Height
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:18 mm
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:61.5 mm
Cables included
- M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2:USB Type-C to USB Type-C
- CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black:USB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AC1502, CM198
24 specifications	A ACT M.2 NVMe/PCIe dual SSD docking clone station, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 Model AC1502 View product	B Ugreen CM198 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black Model CM198 View product
Hard drive3 differ
Storage media typeDiffers	SSD	HDD, SSD
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	M.2	Serial ATA III
Storage drive sizes supportedDiffers	M.2	2.5,3.5"
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
MaterialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	10 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Backup functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TRIM supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
UASP supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	77 mm	112 mm
DepthDiffers	77 mm	162 mm
HeightDiffers	18 mm	61.5 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	185 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	56 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	133 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	332 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedDiffers	USB Type-C to USB Type-C	USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons