Product comparison · 2 stick vacuums & electric brooms

Hoover ATV204GB 011 vs Hoover UH70210 stick vacuum/electric broom Upright vacuum Dry HEPA Bagless Blue

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 3identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product type
    • ATV204GB 011:Stick vacuum
    • UH70210 stick vacuum/electric broom Upright vacuum Dry HEPA Bagless Blue:Upright vacuum
  • Vacuum air filtering
    • ATV204GB 011:EPA
    • UH70210 stick vacuum/electric broom Upright vacuum Dry HEPA Bagless Blue:HEPA
  • Dirt separating method
    • ATV204GB 011:Cyclonic
    • UH70210 stick vacuum/electric broom Upright vacuum Dry HEPA Bagless Blue:Multi cyclonic/filtering
  • Cord length
    • ATV204GB 011:1.5 m
    • UH70210 stick vacuum/electric broom Upright vacuum Dry HEPA Bagless Blue:7.62 m

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ATV204GB 011, UH70210
14 specifications
Design1 differ
Product typeDiffersStick vacuumUpright vacuum
Dust container typeBaglessBagless
Product colourBlueBlue
Dust capacityKnown for one1 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDry
Vacuum air filteringDiffersEPAHEPA
Dirt separating methodDiffersCyclonicMulti cyclonic/filtering
Cleaning surfacesCarpet, Hard floorCarpet, Hard floor
Ergonomics1 differ
Cord lengthDiffers1.5 m7.62 m
Removable filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power controlKnown for oneElectronicUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.07 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Upholstery nozzle includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Crevice toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More stick vacuums & electric brooms comparisons

All stick vacuums & electric brooms comparisons