Product comparison · 2 steam ironing stations

Philips GC9671/51 steam ironing station vs Tefal Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station

10specifications compared
5differ
5identical
35known for one product only

Key differences

Steam boost performance
- GC9671/51 steam ironing station:500 g/min
- Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station:120 g/min
Soleplate type
- GC9671/51 steam ironing station:T-ionicGlide soleplate
- Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station:Ceramic soleplate
Maximum steam pressure
- GC9671/51 steam ironing station:7.5 bar
- Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station:5 bar
Water tank capacity
- GC9671/51 steam ironing station:1.8 L
- Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station:1.2 L
Product colour
- GC9671/51 steam ironing station:Brown, White
- Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station:Blue, White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GC9671/51, SV6010
45 specifications	A Philips GC9671/51 steam ironing station Model GC9671/51 View product	B Tefal Fasteo SV6010 steam ironing station Model SV6010 View product
Features5 differ
Iron powerKnown for one	2400 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Steam boost performanceDiffers	500 g/min	120 g/min
Soleplate typeDiffers	T-ionicGlide soleplate	Ceramic soleplate
Maximum steam pressureDiffers	7.5 bar	5 bar
Removable water tankKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank capacityDiffers	1.8 L	1.2 L
Continuous steamKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Continuous steam performanceKnown for one	150 g/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Brown, White	Blue, White
Automatic anti-calcKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Calc-clean functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto shut-offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LockingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	7.3 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Refill any timeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Safe for all fabricsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soleplate gliding star ratingKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soleplate scratch-resistance star ratingKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for tap waterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Calc clean reminderKnown for one	Light	Unknown — not stated by the source
Continuous fillKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Adjustable thermostatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy savingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy saving percentageKnown for one	50%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one	1.8 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose lengthKnown for one	1.7 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	233 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	453 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	285 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Iron weightKnown for one	800 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	5.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	100%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	310 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	510 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	350 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	7.3 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Indicationidentical
Indication lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More steam ironing station comparisons

All steam ironing station comparisons