Product comparison · 2 steam cookers

Kenwood FS620 steam cooker vs Philips Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 1identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The Kenwood FS620 steam cooker has 350 W more power than the Philips Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker (2000 W vs 1650 W). The Kenwood FS620 steam cooker has 3,647.56 kg more weight than the Philips Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker (3655 kg vs 7.44 kg). Only the Philips Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker has dishwasher-proof parts. Product colour: Silver on the Kenwood FS620 steam cooker, Black, Copper on the Philips Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker.

  • Product colour
    • FS620 steam cooker:Silver
    • Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker:Black, Copper
  • Dishwasher-proof parts
    • FS620 steam cooker:No
    • Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker:Yes
  • Power
    • FS620 steam cooker:2000 W
    • Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker:1650 W
  • Weight
    • FS620 steam cooker:3655 kg
    • Series 7000 NX0960/90 Air Steam Cooker:7.44 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of FS620, NX0960/90
39 specifications
Features1 differ
Number of basketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 basket(s)
Appliance placementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCountertop
Auto cook functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack, Copper
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRotary
DisplayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Interior capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 L
Basket volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.2 L
Bowl capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 L
Removable bowlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 m
MaterialKnown for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Rice bowlKnown for one1.2 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-stick coated platesKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Integrated timerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Timer typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDigital
Easy to cleanYesYes
Dishwasher-proof partsDiffersNoYes
Auto power offKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auto-off timer cooks food safelyKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Water level indicatorKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Indication lightKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers2000 W1650 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source345 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source438 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source232 mm
WeightDiffers3655 kg7.44 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one220 x 321 x 405 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90%
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Main body materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)
Cooking functions & programsidentical
Automatic keep warmKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one345 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one270 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one310 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one4.28 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More steam cooker comparisons

All steam cooker comparisons