Product comparison · 2 split-system air conditioners

Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White vs Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 4identical
  • 39known for one product only

Key differences

The Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White has 4 dB more indoor unit sound power level than the Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White (60 dB vs 56 dB). The Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White has 38.1 kg more indoor unit weight than the Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White (48 kg vs 9.9 kg). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating on the Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White, Heating, Cooling on the Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White. Energy efficiency class (cooling): A++ on the Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White, A+++ on the Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White. Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season): A++ on the Samsung Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White, A+++ on the Whirlpool FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White.

  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White:A++
    • FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White:A+++
  • Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)
    • Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White:A++
    • FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White:A+++
  • Indoor unit sound power level
    • Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White:56 dB
    • FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White:60 dB
  • Indoor unit weight
    • Wind-Free AR60F09C1AWNEU air conditioner Air conditioner indoor unit White:9.9 kg
    • FM18IDUWA2 Air conditioner indoor unit White:48 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AR60F09C1AWNEU, FM18IDUWA2
48 specifications
Features1 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, HeatingHeating, Cooling
Seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER)Known for one7.9Unknown — not stated by the source
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Warmer heating season)Known for one5.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Average heating season)Known for one4.6Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one4.16Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one2500 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (min)Known for one1000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one3500 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Average heating season)Known for one3200 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (min)Known for one880 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (max)Known for one5000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (nominal)Known for one9000 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity (nominal)Known for one10919 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR32Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose length (max)Known for one15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Gas hose diameterKnown for one9.52 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Liquid hose diameterKnown for one6.35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one0.9 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (cooling)Known for one-10 - 46 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (heating)Known for one-15 - 24 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Inverter technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA++A+++
Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)DiffersA++A+++
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one111 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Warmer heating season)Known for one323 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)Known for one670 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for one2.5 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (heating) (Average heating season)Known for one2.2 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (heating) (Warmer heating season)Known for one1.2 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit2 differ
Indoor unit sound power levelDiffers56 dB60 dB
Indoor units quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit widthKnown for one88.9 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit depthKnown for one21.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit heightKnown for one29.9 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit weightDiffers9.9 kg48 kg
Indoor unit typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWall-mountable
Indoor unit package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source106 cm
Indoor unit package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 cm
Indoor unit package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 cm
Indoor unit package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source53 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More split-system air conditioner comparisons

All split-system air conditioner comparisons