Product comparison · 2 split-system air conditioners

Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White vs LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 4identical
  • 39known for one product only

Key differences

The LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White has 5.2 more seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER) than the Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White (11.5 vs 6.3). The LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White has 10 Hz more AC input frequency than the Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White (60 Hz vs 50 Hz). The Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White has 1.3 cm more indoor unit width than the LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White (79 cm vs 77.7 cm). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Heating on the Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White, Heating, Cooling on the LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White. Refrigerating medium: R32 on the Hisense KITHALO+09WF Split system White, R410A on the LG MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:Cooling, Heating
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:Heating, Cooling
  • Seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER)
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:6.3
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:11.5
  • Refrigerating medium
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:R32
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:R410A
  • AC input voltage
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:220 - 240 V
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:230 V
  • AC input frequency
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:50 Hz
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:60 Hz
  • Indoor unit width
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:79 cm
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:77.7 cm
  • Indoor unit depth
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:19.7 cm
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:20.2 cm
  • Indoor unit height
    • KITHALO+09WF Split system White:25.5 cm
    • MW122H4 air conditioner Split system White:22.2 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of KITHALO+09WF, MW122H4
54 specifications
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, HeatingHeating, Cooling
Seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER)Differs6.311.5
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Average heating season)Known for one4.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one3.4Unknown — not stated by the source
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one2600 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (min)Known for one1000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one3000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Average heating season)Known for one2700 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (min)Known for one1000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (max)Known for one3000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumDiffersR32R410A
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one675 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Hose length (max)Known for one20 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Gas hose diameterKnown for one9.52 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Liquid hose diameterKnown for one6.35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one0.9 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (cooling)Known for one-15 - 43 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (heating)Known for one-20 - 24 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Multi-splitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Inverter technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
IonizerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Timer duration (maximum)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 h
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Known for oneA++Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)Known for oneA+Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one145 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)Known for one751 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V230 V
AC input frequencyDiffers50 Hz60 Hz
Current (cooling)Known for one3.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Current (heating)Known for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit4 differ
Indoor unit noise level (low speed)Known for one19 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit noise level (high speed)Known for one401 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit sound power levelKnown for one57 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor units quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit widthDiffers79 cm77.7 cm
Indoor unit depthDiffers19.7 cm20.2 cm
Indoor unit heightDiffers25.5 cm22.2 cm
Indoor unit weightDiffers7.1 kg7.8 kg
Outdoor unit2 differ
Outdoor unit sound power levelKnown for one62 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Outdoor units quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Outdoor unit widthDiffers66 cm71.5 cm
Outdoor unit heightDiffers48.3 cm54 cm
Outdoor unit weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26.5 kg
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More split-system air conditioner comparisons

All split-system air conditioner comparisons