Product comparison · 2 split-system air conditioners

Fujitsu ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White vs Fujitsu ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White

34specifications compared
23differ
11identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:7
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:6.94
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Average heating season)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:4
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:3.87
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:3.5
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:3.42
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:3.92
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:3.68
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:3400 W
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:5200 W
Cooling capacity in watts (max)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:3900 W
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:6000 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Average heating season)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:4000 W
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:6300 W
Heating capacity in watts (max)
- ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White:5300 W
- ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White:9100 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ASHG12LMCA, ASHG18LFCA
38 specifications	A Fujitsu ASHG12LMCA air conditioner Split system White Model ASHG12LMCA View product	B Fujitsu ASHG18LFCA air conditioner Split system White Model ASHG18LFCA View product
Features9 differ
Type	Split system	Split system
Product colour	White	White
Air conditioner functions	Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating	Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating
Seasonal efficiency rating (cooling) (SEER)Differs	7	6.94
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Average heating season)Differs	4	3.87
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs	3.5	3.42
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Differs	3.92	3.68
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Differs	3400 W	5200 W
Cooling capacity in watts (min)	900 W	900 W
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Differs	3900 W	6000 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Average heating season)Differs	4000 W	6300 W
Heating capacity in watts (min)	900 W	900 W
Heating capacity in watts (max)Differs	5300 W	9100 W
TimerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one	24 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers	1.8 l/h	2.6 l/h
Operating temperature (cooling) (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-10 - 46 °C
Operating temperature (heating) (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-15 - 24 °C
Power5 differ
Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)Differs	A+	A
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Differs	170 kWh	262 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)Differs	1225 kWh	2130 kWh
Power consumption (cooling) (max)Differs	970 W	1520 W
Power consumption (heating) (max)Differs	1020 W	1710 W
AC input voltage	230 V	230 V
AC input frequency	50 Hz	50 Hz
Energy efficiency class (cooling) (legacy scale)	A++	A++
Indoor unit4 differ
Indoor unit type	Wall-mountable	Wall-mountable
Indoor unit noise level (high speed)	43 dB	43 dB
Indoor unit widthDiffers	84 cm	99.8 cm
Indoor unit depthDiffers	20.3 cm	23.8 cm
Indoor unit heightDiffers	26.8 cm	32 cm
Indoor unit weightDiffers	8.5 kg	14 kg
Outdoor unit4 differ
Outdoor unit noise level	50 dB	50 dB
Outdoor unit widthDiffers	66.3 cm	79 cm
Outdoor unit depthDiffers	29.3 cm	29.8 cm
Outdoor unit heightDiffers	53.5 cm	62 cm
Outdoor unit weightDiffers	26 kg	41 kg
Technical details1 differ
AirflowDiffers	750 m³/h	900 m³/h

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More split-system air conditioner comparisons

All split-system air conditioner comparisons