Product comparison · 2 split-system air conditioners

Ariston AERES NET 25 MA1-O vs Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1

Add a product
  • 51specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 36identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Ariston AERES NET 25 MA1-O has 0.05 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1 (3.05 vs 3). The Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1 has 800 W more cooling capacity in watts (nominal) than the Ariston AERES NET 25 MA1-O (3400 W vs 2600 W). The Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1 has 200 W more heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Warmer heating season) than the Ariston AERES NET 25 MA1-O (2500 W vs 2300 W). Only the Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1 has built-in display. Type: Air conditioner outdoor unit on the Ariston AERES NET 25 MA1-O, Split system on the Ariston AERES NET 35 MMA1.

  • Type
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:Air conditioner outdoor unit
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:Split system
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:3.05
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:3
  • Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:2600 W
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:3400 W
  • Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Warmer heating season)
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:2300 W
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:2500 W
  • Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Colder heating season)
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:2700 W
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:3400 W
  • Cooling capacity (nominal)
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:8871.564 BTU/h
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:11601.276 BTU/h
  • Built-in display
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:No
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:Yes
  • Refrigerating medium weight
    • AERES NET 25 MA1-O:490 g
    • AERES NET 35 MMA1:520 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AERES NET 25 MA1-O, AERES NET 35 MMA1
66 specifications
Features8 differ
TypeDiffersAir conditioner outdoor unitSplit system
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.053
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Differs2600 W3400 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Warmer heating season)Differs2300 W2500 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Colder heating season)Differs2700 W3400 W
Cooling capacity (nominal)Differs8871.564 BTU/h11601.276 BTU/h
Built-in displayDiffersNoYes
Refrigerating medium weightDiffers490 g520 g
Gas hose diameterKnown for one9.52 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Liquid hose diameterKnown for one6.35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (cooling)Known for one15 - 53 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature range outdoor unit (heating)Known for one20 - 30 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Differs150 kWh196 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Warmer heating season)Differs632 kWh687 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)Differs700 kWh770 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one220 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one10 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor unit3 differ
Indoor unit typeDiffersNot includedWall-mountable
Indoor units quantityDiffers01
Indoor unit weightDiffers0 g7 kg
Indoor unit noise level (low speed)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22 dB
Indoor unit sound power levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source53 dB
Indoor unit widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source77.7 cm
Indoor unit depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20.1 cm
Indoor unit heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25 cm
Outdoor unit1 differ
Outdoor unit weightDiffers19 kg20 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one717 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one281 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one464 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one19 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More split-system air conditioner comparisons

All split-system air conditioner comparisons