Product comparison · 2 speaker sets

ERAZER X89015 2.1 vs Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The ERAZER X89015 2.1 has 16 W more RMS rated power than the Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set (36 W vs 20 W). The ERAZER X89015 2.1 has 8 W more satellite speakers RMS power than the Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set (18 W vs 10 W). The ERAZER X89015 2.1 has 8 W more subwoofer RMS power than the Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set (18 W vs 10 W). Only the Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set has Bluetooth. Product colour: Black, Blue on the ERAZER X89015 2.1, Black on the Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set.

RMS rated power
- X89015 2.1:36 W
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:20 W
Product colour
- X89015 2.1:Black, Blue
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:Black
Satellite speakers RMS power
- X89015 2.1:18 W
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:10 W
Satellite speaker dimensions (WxDxH)
- X89015 2.1:140 x 100 x 300 mm
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:89 x 82 x 133 mm
Subwoofer RMS power
- X89015 2.1:18 W
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:10 W
Subwoofer dimensions (W x D x H)
- X89015 2.1:230 x 240 x 320 mm
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:240 x 155 x 245 mm
Connectivity technology
- X89015 2.1:Wired
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:Wired & Wireless
Bluetooth
- X89015 2.1:No
- MMS2580B/77 speaker set:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X89015 2.1, MMS2580B/77
33 specifications	A ERAZER X89015 2.1 View product	B Philips MMS2580B/77 speaker set Model MMS2580B/77 View product
Performance2 differ
Audio output channels	2.1 channels	2.1 channels
RMS rated powerDiffers	36 W	20 W
Recommended usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PC/Laptop
Product colourDiffers	Black, Blue	Black
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported radio bandsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FM
Amplifieridentical
Amplification device includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Satellite speakers2 differ
Number of satellite speakers	2	2
Satellite speakers RMS powerDiffers	18 W	10 W
Satellite speaker dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	140 x 100 x 300 mm	89 x 82 x 133 mm
Satellite speaker weightKnown for one	755 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Subwoofer2 differ
Subwoofer RMS powerDiffers	18 W	10 W
Subwoofer driver diameter (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.7 cm (5")
Subwoofer dimensions (W x D x H)Differs	230 x 240 x 320 mm	240 x 155 x 245 mm
Subwoofer weightKnown for one	5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired	Wired & Wireless
BluetoothDiffers	No	Yes
Bluetooth rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 m
Other featuresidentical
AirPlay	No	No
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RCA
Remote control includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
User guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Warranty cardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Connector(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AUX
Satellite speaker driver diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.62 cm (3")
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	312 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	210 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	390 mm
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More speaker set comparisons

All speaker set comparisons