Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sandberg Solar Charger vs TP-Link TAPO A202

9specifications compared
5differ
4identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg Solar Charger has 95.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (100 W vs 4.5 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 184.8 mm more width than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (396 mm vs 211.2 mm). The TP-Link TAPO A202 has 133.6 mm more depth than the Sandberg Solar Charger (173.6 mm vs 40 mm). USB connector type: USB Type-A, USB Type-C on the Sandberg Solar Charger, USB Type-C on the TP-Link TAPO A202.

Rated power
- Solar Charger:100 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
USB connector type
- Solar Charger:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
- TAPO A202:USB Type-C
Width
- Solar Charger:396 mm
- TAPO A202:211.2 mm
Depth
- Solar Charger:40 mm
- TAPO A202:173.6 mm
Height
- Solar Charger:442 mm
- TAPO A202:16.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 421-45, TAPO A202
31 specifications	A Sandberg Solar Charger Model 421-45 View product	B TP-Link TAPO A202 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	100 W	4.5 W
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Solar panel powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.5 W
Solar panel voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features1 differ
Solar cell type	Monocrystalline silicon	Monocrystalline silicon
Connector type	USB	USB
Product colour	Black	Black
Water-resistantKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB port	Yes	Yes
USB ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one	0 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
FrameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	UKCA, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one	5 year(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	457 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	67 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	417 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	3.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	396 mm	211.2 mm
DepthDiffers	40 mm	173.6 mm
HeightDiffers	442 mm	16.9 mm
WeightKnown for one	2.9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded widthKnown for one	39.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded depthKnown for one	4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded heightKnown for one	44.2 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons