Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sandberg Solar Charger vs Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 2identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel has 290 W more rated power than the Sandberg Solar Charger (330 W vs 40 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 3.5% more cell efficiency than the Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel (23% vs 19.5%). The Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel has 797 mm more width than the Sandberg Solar Charger (1002 mm vs 205 mm). Connector type: USB on the Sandberg Solar Charger, MC4 on the Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel. Operating temperature (T-T): -10 - 65 °C on the Sandberg Solar Charger, -40 - 85 °C on the Sharp NU-JC330 solar panel.

  • Rated power
    • Solar Charger:40 W
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:330 W
  • Connector type
    • Solar Charger:USB
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:MC4
  • Cell efficiency
    • Solar Charger:23%
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:19.5%
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • Solar Charger:-10 - 65 °C
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:-40 - 85 °C
  • Width
    • Solar Charger:205 mm
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:1002 mm
  • Depth
    • Solar Charger:30 mm
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:40 mm
  • Height
    • Solar Charger:323 mm
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:1684 mm
  • Weight
    • Solar Charger:900 g
    • NU-JC330 solar panel:19.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 421-20, NU-JC330
36 specifications
A

Sandberg

Solar Charger

Model 421-20

View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers40 W330 W
CurrentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 A
Current at maximum power (Imp)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.63 A
Maximum system voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 V
Short-circuit current (Isc)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10.35 A
Voltage at maximum power (Vmp)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34.27 V
Voltage at open-circuit (Voc)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41.32 V
Features2 differ
Solar cell typeMonocrystalline siliconMonocrystalline silicon
Connector typeDiffersUSBMC4
Product colourBlackBlack
Water-resistantKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for oneUSB Type-A, USB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyDiffers23%19.5%
Cable lengthKnown for one0 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIP68
Number of cellsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-10 - 65 °C-40 - 85 °C
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUKCA, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, CEUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one5 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one220 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one45 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one360 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one1.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers205 mm1002 mm
DepthDiffers30 mm40 mm
HeightDiffers323 mm1684 mm
WeightDiffers900 g19.5 kg
Folded widthKnown for one32.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Folded depthKnown for one3.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Folded heightKnown for one21.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded widthKnown for one32.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded depthKnown for one2.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded heightKnown for one83 cmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons