Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sandberg Solar Charger vs TP-Link Tapo A201

6specifications compared
6differ
0identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg Solar Charger has 197.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link Tapo A201 (200 W vs 2.5 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 378 mm more package width than the TP-Link Tapo A201 (540 mm vs 162 mm). The TP-Link Tapo A201 has 51 mm more package depth than the Sandberg Solar Charger (211 mm vs 160 mm). Product colour: Black on the Sandberg Solar Charger, White on the TP-Link Tapo A201. Package weight: 9.5 kg on the Sandberg Solar Charger, 600 g on the TP-Link Tapo A201.

Rated power
- Solar Charger:200 W
- Tapo A201:2.5 W
Product colour
- Solar Charger:Black
- Tapo A201:White
Package width
- Solar Charger:540 mm
- Tapo A201:162 mm
Package depth
- Solar Charger:160 mm
- Tapo A201:211 mm
Package height
- Solar Charger:700 mm
- Tapo A201:101.5 mm
Package weight
- Solar Charger:9.5 kg
- Tapo A201:600 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 420-82, Tapo A201
28 specifications	A Sandberg Solar Charger Model 420-82 View product	B TP-Link Tapo A201 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	200 W	2.5 W
Maximum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features1 differ
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP65
Compatible productsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tapo C400; Tapo C410; Tapo C420;Tapo C425; Tapo C420S2, Tapo C400S2
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC, RoHS, RCM
Solar cell typeKnown for one	Monocrystalline silicon	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for one	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	22%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	540 mm	162 mm
Package depthDiffers	160 mm	211 mm
Package heightDiffers	700 mm	101.5 mm
Package weightDiffers	9.5 kg	600 g
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	173.4 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120.4 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.7 mm
WeightKnown for one	9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded widthKnown for one	51.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded heightKnown for one	68.9 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded widthKnown for one	2.3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded heightKnown for one	68.9 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons