Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sandberg Solar Charger vs TP-Link Tapo A200

8specifications compared
7differ
1identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg Solar Charger has 195.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link Tapo A200 (200 W vs 4.5 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 2 more USB ports quantity than the TP-Link Tapo A200 (3 vs 1). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 340 mm more package width than the TP-Link Tapo A200 (540 mm vs 200 mm). USB connector type: USB Type-A, USB Type-C on the Sandberg Solar Charger, Micro-USB on the TP-Link Tapo A200. Package weight: 9.5 kg on the Sandberg Solar Charger, 840 g on the TP-Link Tapo A200.

Rated power
- Solar Charger:200 W
- Tapo A200:4.5 W
USB connector type
- Solar Charger:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
- Tapo A200:Micro-USB
USB ports quantity
- Solar Charger:3
- Tapo A200:1
Package width
- Solar Charger:540 mm
- Tapo A200:200 mm
Package depth
- Solar Charger:160 mm
- Tapo A200:266 mm
Package height
- Solar Charger:700 mm
- Tapo A200:88 mm
Package weight
- Solar Charger:9.5 kg
- Tapo A200:840 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 420-82, Tapo A200
29 specifications	A Sandberg Solar Charger Model 420-82 View product	B TP-Link Tapo A200 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	200 W	4.5 W
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features2 differ
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 360°
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP65
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	Micro-USB
USB port	Yes	Yes
USB ports quantityDiffers	3	1
Compatible productsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tapo C425, Tapo C420, Tapo C400
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 m
Solar cell typeKnown for one	Monocrystalline silicon	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	22%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	540 mm	200 mm
Package depthDiffers	160 mm	266 mm
Package heightDiffers	700 mm	88 mm
Package weightDiffers	9.5 kg	840 g
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	238 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	174.8 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	17.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded widthKnown for one	51.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded heightKnown for one	68.9 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded widthKnown for one	2.3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded heightKnown for one	68.9 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons