Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sandberg Solar Charger vs TP-Link Tapo A201

6specifications compared
6differ
0identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg Solar Charger has 97.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link Tapo A201 (100 W vs 2.5 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 208 mm more package width than the TP-Link Tapo A201 (370 mm vs 162 mm). The TP-Link Tapo A201 has 101 mm more package depth than the Sandberg Solar Charger (211 mm vs 110 mm). Product colour: Black on the Sandberg Solar Charger, White on the TP-Link Tapo A201. Package weight: 4.8 kg on the Sandberg Solar Charger, 600 g on the TP-Link Tapo A201.

Rated power
- Solar Charger:100 W
- Tapo A201:2.5 W
Product colour
- Solar Charger:Black
- Tapo A201:White
Package width
- Solar Charger:370 mm
- Tapo A201:162 mm
Package depth
- Solar Charger:110 mm
- Tapo A201:211 mm
Package height
- Solar Charger:110 mm
- Tapo A201:101.5 mm
Package weight
- Solar Charger:4.8 kg
- Tapo A201:600 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 420-81, Tapo A201
29 specifications	A Sandberg Solar Charger Model 420-81 View product	B TP-Link Tapo A201 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	100 W	2.5 W
Maximum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features1 differ
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP65
Compatible productsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tapo C400; Tapo C410; Tapo C420;Tapo C425; Tapo C420S2, Tapo C400S2
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC, RoHS, RCM
Solar cell typeKnown for one	Monocrystalline silicon	Unknown — not stated by the source
Installation typeKnown for one	Ground	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for one	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	22%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	370 mm	162 mm
Package depthDiffers	110 mm	211 mm
Package heightDiffers	110 mm	101.5 mm
Package weightDiffers	4.8 kg	600 g
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	173.4 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120.4 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.7 mm
WeightKnown for one	4.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded widthKnown for one	35.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Folded heightKnown for one	46.3 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded widthKnown for one	162.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Unfolded heightKnown for one	46.3 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons