Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel vs TP-Link TAPO A202

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 145.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (150 W vs 4.5 W). The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 145.5 W more solar panel power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (150 W vs 4.5 W). The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 31.38 V more solar panel voltage than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (36.58 V vs 5.2 V). Solar cell type: Polycrystalline silicon on the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel, Monocrystalline silicon on the TP-Link TAPO A202. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 85 °C on the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel, -20 - 45 °C on the TP-Link TAPO A202.

Rated power
- PFM371-150 solar panel:150 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
Solar panel power
- PFM371-150 solar panel:150 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
Solar panel voltage
- PFM371-150 solar panel:36.58 V
- TAPO A202:5.2 V
Solar cell type
- PFM371-150 solar panel:Polycrystalline silicon
- TAPO A202:Monocrystalline silicon
Operating temperature (T-T)
- PFM371-150 solar panel:-40 - 85 °C
- TAPO A202:-20 - 45 °C
Width
- PFM371-150 solar panel:1010 mm
- TAPO A202:211.2 mm
Depth
- PFM371-150 solar panel:990 mm
- TAPO A202:173.6 mm
Height
- PFM371-150 solar panel:35 mm
- TAPO A202:16.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PFM371-150, TAPO A202
22 specifications	A Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel Model PFM371-150 View product	B TP-Link TAPO A202 View product
Power3 differ
Rated powerDiffers	150 W	4.5 W
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Solar panel powerDiffers	150 W	4.5 W
Solar panel voltageDiffers	36.58 V	5.2 V
Solar panel currentKnown for one	4100 mA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Solar cell typeDiffers	Polycrystalline silicon	Monocrystalline silicon
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
FrameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP65	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	17.2%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cellsKnown for one	72	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 85 °C	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	1010 mm	211.2 mm
DepthDiffers	990 mm	173.6 mm
HeightDiffers	35 mm	16.9 mm
WeightKnown for one	12 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons