Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel vs Sandberg Solar Charger

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 120 W more rated power than the Sandberg Solar Charger (150 W vs 30 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 5.8% more cell efficiency than the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel (23% vs 17.2%). The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 805 mm more width than the Sandberg Solar Charger (1010 mm vs 205 mm). Solar cell type: Polycrystalline silicon on the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel, Monocrystalline silicon on the Sandberg Solar Charger. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 85 °C on the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel, -10 - 60 °C on the Sandberg Solar Charger.

Rated power
- PFM371-150 solar panel:150 W
- Solar Charger:30 W
Solar cell type
- PFM371-150 solar panel:Polycrystalline silicon
- Solar Charger:Monocrystalline silicon
Cell efficiency
- PFM371-150 solar panel:17.2%
- Solar Charger:23%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- PFM371-150 solar panel:-40 - 85 °C
- Solar Charger:-10 - 60 °C
Width
- PFM371-150 solar panel:1010 mm
- Solar Charger:205 mm
Depth
- PFM371-150 solar panel:990 mm
- Solar Charger:30 mm
Height
- PFM371-150 solar panel:35 mm
- Solar Charger:345 mm
Weight
- PFM371-150 solar panel:12 kg
- Solar Charger:700 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PFM371-150, 421-19
32 specifications	A Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel Model PFM371-150 View product	B Sandberg Solar Charger Model 421-19 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	150 W	30 W
Solar panel powerKnown for one	150 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Solar panel voltageKnown for one	36.58 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Solar panel currentKnown for one	4100 mA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Solar cell typeDiffers	Polycrystalline silicon	Monocrystalline silicon
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Water-resistantKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Cell efficiencyDiffers	17.2%	23%
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 m
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP65	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cellsKnown for one	72	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 85 °C	-10 - 60 °C
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, UKCA
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 year(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	360 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	800 g
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	1010 mm	205 mm
DepthDiffers	990 mm	30 mm
HeightDiffers	35 mm	345 mm
WeightDiffers	12 kg	700 g
Folded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20.5 cm
Folded depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 cm
Folded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.5 cm
Unfolded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.5 cm
Unfolded depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 mm
Unfolded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	62 cm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons