Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel vs Sandberg Solar Charger

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 0identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 50 W more rated power than the Sandberg Solar Charger (150 W vs 100 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 4.8% more cell efficiency than the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel (22% vs 17.2%). The Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel has 7.5 kg more weight than the Sandberg Solar Charger (12 kg vs 4.5 kg). Solar cell type: Polycrystalline silicon on the Dahua Technology PFM371-150 solar panel, Monocrystalline silicon on the Sandberg Solar Charger.

  • Rated power
    • PFM371-150 solar panel:150 W
    • Solar Charger:100 W
  • Solar cell type
    • PFM371-150 solar panel:Polycrystalline silicon
    • Solar Charger:Monocrystalline silicon
  • Cell efficiency
    • PFM371-150 solar panel:17.2%
    • Solar Charger:22%
  • Weight
    • PFM371-150 solar panel:12 kg
    • Solar Charger:4.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of PFM371-150, 420-81
26 specifications
A

Dahua Technology

PFM371-150 solar panel

Model PFM371-150

View product
B

Sandberg

Solar Charger

Model 420-81

View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers150 W100 W
Solar panel powerKnown for one150 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Solar panel voltageKnown for one36.58 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Solar panel currentKnown for one4100 mAUnknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Solar cell typeDiffersPolycrystalline siliconMonocrystalline silicon
Installation typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGround
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
USB connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Cell efficiencyDiffers17.2%22%
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneIP65Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cellsKnown for one72Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source370 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.8 kg
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers12 kg4.5 kg
Folded widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35.5 cm
Folded heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source46.3 cm
Unfolded widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source162.5 cm
Unfolded heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source46.3 cm
WidthKnown for one1010 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one990 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 85 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons