Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel vs TP-Link TAPO A202

11specifications compared
11differ
0identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel has 125.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (130 W vs 4.5 W). The Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel has 95.5 W more solar panel power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (100 W vs 4.5 W). The Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel has 13.6 V more solar panel voltage than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (18.8 V vs 5.2 V). Product colour: Black, White on the Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel, Black on the TP-Link TAPO A202. Operating temperature (T-T): -20 - 60 °C on the Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel, -20 - 45 °C on the TP-Link TAPO A202.

Rated power
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:130 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
Solar panel power
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:100 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
Solar panel voltage
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:18.8 V
- TAPO A202:5.2 V
Product colour
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:Black, White
- TAPO A202:Black
Operating temperature (T-T)
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:-20 - 60 °C
- TAPO A202:-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:0 - 40 °C
- TAPO A202:-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:0 - 95%
- TAPO A202:10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:0 - 95%
- TAPO A202:0 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DH-PFM378-B100-WB, TAPO A202
25 specifications	A Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel Model DH-PFM378-B100-WB View product	B TP-Link TAPO A202 View product
Power3 differ
Rated powerDiffers	130 W	4.5 W
Solar panel powerDiffers	100 W	4.5 W
Solar panel voltageDiffers	18.8 V	5.2 V
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, White	Black
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP65	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	CE: EN 55032:2015+A11:2020,EN 55035:2017+A11:2020,EN 55024:2010+A1:2015,EN 50130-4:2011+A1:2014 UKCA: EN 55032:2015+A11:2020,EN 55035:2017+A11:2020,EN 55024:2010+A1:2015,EN 50130-4:2011+A1:2014	Unknown — not stated by the source
Solar cell typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monocrystalline silicon
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
FrameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 60 °C	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 95%	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 95%	0 - 90%
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	880 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	765 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	275 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	23.8 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	815 mm	211.2 mm
DepthDiffers	846.8 mm	173.6 mm
HeightDiffers	893.3 mm	16.9 mm
WeightKnown for one	21 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons