Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel vs Sandberg Solar Charger

7specifications compared
7differ
0identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg Solar Charger has 70 W more rated power than the Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel (200 W vs 130 W). The Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel has 340 mm more package width than the Sandberg Solar Charger (880 mm vs 540 mm). The Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel has 605 mm more package depth than the Sandberg Solar Charger (765 mm vs 160 mm). Product colour: Black, White on the Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel, Black on the Sandberg Solar Charger.

Rated power
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:130 W
- Solar Charger:200 W
Product colour
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:Black, White
- Solar Charger:Black
Package width
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:880 mm
- Solar Charger:540 mm
Package depth
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:765 mm
- Solar Charger:160 mm
Package height
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:275 mm
- Solar Charger:700 mm
Package weight
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:23.8 kg
- Solar Charger:9.5 kg
Weight
- DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel:21 kg
- Solar Charger:9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DH-PFM378-B100-WB, 420-82
28 specifications	A Dahua Technology DH-PFM378-B100-WB solar panel Model DH-PFM378-B100-WB View product	B Sandberg Solar Charger Model 420-82 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	130 W	200 W
Solar panel powerKnown for one	100 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Solar panel voltageKnown for one	18.8 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, White	Black
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP65	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	CE: EN 55032:2015+A11:2020,EN 55035:2017+A11:2020,EN 55024:2010+A1:2015,EN 50130-4:2011+A1:2014 UKCA: EN 55032:2015+A11:2020,EN 55035:2017+A11:2020,EN 55024:2010+A1:2015,EN 50130-4:2011+A1:2014	Unknown — not stated by the source
Solar cell typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monocrystalline silicon
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22%
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	880 mm	540 mm
Package depthDiffers	765 mm	160 mm
Package heightDiffers	275 mm	700 mm
Package weightDiffers	23.8 kg	9.5 kg
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	815 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	846.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	893.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	21 kg	9 kg
Folded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	51.8 cm
Folded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	68.9 cm
Unfolded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.3 m
Unfolded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	68.9 cm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons