Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel vs Sandberg Solar Charger

12specifications compared
11differ
1identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel has 80 W more rated power than the Sandberg Solar Charger (120 W vs 40 W). The Sandberg Solar Charger has 2% more cell efficiency than the Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel (23% vs 21%). The Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel has 1,131 mm more package width than the Sandberg Solar Charger (1351 mm vs 220 mm). Operating temperature (T-T): -20 - 60 °C on the Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel, -10 - 65 °C on the Sandberg Solar Charger. Weight: 22.5 kg on the Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel, 900 g on the Sandberg Solar Charger.

Rated power
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:120 W
- Solar Charger:40 W
Cell efficiency
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:21%
- Solar Charger:23%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:-20 - 60 °C
- Solar Charger:-10 - 65 °C
Package width
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:1351 mm
- Solar Charger:220 mm
Package depth
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:796 mm
- Solar Charger:45 mm
Package height
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:378 mm
- Solar Charger:360 mm
Package weight
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:32 kg
- Solar Charger:1.1 kg
Width
- DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel:1149.5 mm
- Solar Charger:205 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DH-PFM363L-D1, 421-20
35 specifications	A Dahua Technology DH-PFM363L-D1 solar panel Model DH-PFM363L-D1 View product	B Sandberg Solar Charger Model 421-20 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	120 W	40 W
Solar panel powerKnown for one	120 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Solar cell type	Monocrystalline silicon	Monocrystalline silicon
Connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Water-resistantKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Cell efficiencyDiffers	21%	23%
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 m
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Best usesKnown for one	Camera	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	0 - 360°	Unknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP66	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 60 °C	-10 - 65 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UKCA, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, CE
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 year(s)
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	1351 mm	220 mm
Package depthDiffers	796 mm	45 mm
Package heightDiffers	378 mm	360 mm
Package weightDiffers	32 kg	1.1 kg
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	1149.5 mm	205 mm
DepthDiffers	670 mm	30 mm
HeightDiffers	455.2 mm	323 mm
WeightDiffers	22.5 kg	900 g
Folded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32.1 cm
Folded depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.8 cm
Folded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21.4 cm
Unfolded widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32.1 cm
Unfolded depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.2 cm
Unfolded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	83 cm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons