Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX vs Salicru EQX2 60004-T

48specifications compared
20differ
28identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 60004-T has 60.5 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX (66 kVA vs 5.5 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 60004-T has 0.5 V more output operation voltage (min) than the Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX (195.5 V vs 195 V). The Salicru EQX2 60004-T has 88,000 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX (96000 W vs 8000 W). MPP voltage range: 100 - 550 V on the Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX, 180 - 1000 V on the Salicru EQX2 60004-T.

Output power capacity (max)
- EQX2 5002-HSX:5.5 kVA
- EQX2 60004-T:66 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)
- EQX2 5002-HSX:195 V
- EQX2 60004-T:195.5 V
MPP voltage range
- EQX2 5002-HSX:100 - 550 V
- EQX2 60004-T:180 - 1000 V
Maximum input power (DC)
- EQX2 5002-HSX:8000 W
- EQX2 60004-T:96000 W
Maximum power
- EQX2 5002-HSX:5000 W
- EQX2 60004-T:60000 W
DC input voltage
- EQX2 5002-HSX:600 V
- EQX2 60004-T:1100 V
Network voltage
- EQX2 5002-HSX:230 V
- EQX2 60004-T:400 V
Output current
- EQX2 5002-HSX:21.7 A
- EQX2 60004-T:87 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EQX2 5002-HSX, EQX2 60004-T
54 specifications	A Salicru EQX2 5002-HSX View product	B Salicru EQX2 60004-T View product
Features16 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs	5.5 kVA	66 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)Differs	195 V	195.5 V
Number of phasesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
MPP voltage rangeDiffers	100 - 550 V	180 - 1000 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs	8000 W	96000 W
Maximum powerDiffers	5000 W	60000 W
DC input voltageDiffers	600 V	1100 V
Network voltageDiffers	230 V	400 V
Output currentDiffers	21.7 A	87 A
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs	20 A	40 A
Starting voltageDiffers	80 V	180 V
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs	2	4
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers	1	2
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers	15 A	26 A
EfficiencyDiffers	97.6%	98.8%
Efficiency (EU)Differs	97%	98.3%
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	99.9%
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Silicon carbide (SiC)
CertificationDiffers	EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001	Certificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Aluminium
Overvoltage categoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CAT II
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	550 mm	600 mm
DepthDiffers	175 mm	270 mm
HeightDiffers	410 mm	400 mm
WeightDiffers	26 kg	42 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons