Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 17002-T vs Salicru EQX2 6002-HT

Add a product
  • 47specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 33identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 17002-T has 12.1 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HT (18.7 kVA vs 6.6 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 17002-T has 17,600 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HT (27200 W vs 9600 W). The Salicru EQX2 17002-T has 11,000 W more maximum power than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HT (17000 W vs 6000 W). MPP voltage range: 160 - 1000 V on the Salicru EQX2 17002-T, 200 - 850 V on the Salicru EQX2 6002-HT. Cooling type: Active on the Salicru EQX2 17002-T, Passive on the Salicru EQX2 6002-HT.

  • Output power capacity (max)
    • EQX2 17002-T:18.7 kVA
    • EQX2 6002-HT:6.6 kVA
  • MPP voltage range
    • EQX2 17002-T:160 - 1000 V
    • EQX2 6002-HT:200 - 850 V
  • Maximum input power (DC)
    • EQX2 17002-T:27200 W
    • EQX2 6002-HT:9600 W
  • Maximum power
    • EQX2 17002-T:17000 W
    • EQX2 6002-HT:6000 W
  • DC input voltage
    • EQX2 17002-T:1100 V
    • EQX2 6002-HT:1000 V
  • Output current
    • EQX2 17002-T:24.6 A
    • EQX2 6002-HT:8.7 A
  • Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)
    • EQX2 17002-T:40 A
    • EQX2 6002-HT:18 A
  • Number of strings per MPPT
    • EQX2 17002-T:2
    • EQX2 6002-HT:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of EQX2 17002-T, EQX2 6002-HT
56 specifications
Features12 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs18.7 kVA6.6 kVA
Number of phasesKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
MPP voltage rangeDiffers160 - 1000 V200 - 850 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs27200 W9600 W
Maximum powerDiffers17000 W6000 W
DC disconnectorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DC input voltageDiffers1100 V1000 V
Output currentDiffers24.6 A8.7 A
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs40 A18 A
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers21
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers30 A13 A
EfficiencyDiffers98.6%98.1%
Efficiency (EU)Differs98.2%97.3%
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for one99.9%Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneSilicon carbide (SiC)Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCertificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-IEC EN UNE 616831/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 60068-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Number of power levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
Design1 differ
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeDiffersActivePassive
Built-in fanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Overvoltage categoryKnown for oneCAT IIUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers29 kg26 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons