Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 12002-HT vs Salicru EQX2 33004-T

Add a product
  • 46specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 29identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 33004-T has 23.1 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 12002-HT (36.3 kVA vs 13.2 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 33004-T has 33,600 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 12002-HT (52800 W vs 19200 W). The Salicru EQX2 33004-T has 21,000 W more maximum power than the Salicru EQX2 12002-HT (33000 W vs 12000 W). MPP voltage range: 200 - 850 V on the Salicru EQX2 12002-HT, 180 - 1000 V on the Salicru EQX2 33004-T. Power protection features: Over voltage, Overheating, Short circuit on the Salicru EQX2 12002-HT, Over voltage on the Salicru EQX2 33004-T.

  • Output power capacity (max)
    • EQX2 12002-HT:13.2 kVA
    • EQX2 33004-T:36.3 kVA
  • MPP voltage range
    • EQX2 12002-HT:200 - 850 V
    • EQX2 33004-T:180 - 1000 V
  • Maximum input power (DC)
    • EQX2 12002-HT:19200 W
    • EQX2 33004-T:52800 W
  • Maximum power
    • EQX2 12002-HT:12000 W
    • EQX2 33004-T:33000 W
  • DC input voltage
    • EQX2 12002-HT:1000 V
    • EQX2 33004-T:1100 V
  • Output current
    • EQX2 12002-HT:17.4 A
    • EQX2 33004-T:47.8 A
  • Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)
    • EQX2 12002-HT:18 A
    • EQX2 33004-T:40 A
  • Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
    • EQX2 12002-HT:2
    • EQX2 33004-T:4

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of EQX2 12002-HT, EQX2 33004-T
54 specifications
Features12 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs13.2 kVA36.3 kVA
Number of phasesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
MPP voltage rangeDiffers200 - 850 V180 - 1000 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs19200 W52800 W
Maximum powerDiffers12000 W33000 W
DC disconnectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DC input voltageDiffers1000 V1100 V
Output currentDiffers17.4 A47.8 A
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs18 A40 A
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs24
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers12
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers13 A26 A
EfficiencyDiffers98.2%98.8%
Efficiency (EU)Differs97.4%98.3%
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source99.9%
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSilicon carbide (SiC)
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCertificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Design1 differ
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
Power protection featuresDiffersOver voltage, Overheating, Short circuitOver voltage
Overvoltage categoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCAT II
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers550 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers175 mm270 mm
HeightDiffers410 mm400 mm
WeightDiffers28 kg42 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons