Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 10002-SX vs Salicru EQX2 8002-HT

46specifications compared
18differ
28identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 2.2 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 8002-HT (11 kVA vs 8.8 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 0.5 V more output operation voltage (min) than the Salicru EQX2 8002-HT (195.5 V vs 195 V). The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 200 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 8002-HT (13000 W vs 12800 W). MPP voltage range: 80 - 550 V on the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX, 200 - 850 V on the Salicru EQX2 8002-HT. Cooling type: Active on the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX, Passive on the Salicru EQX2 8002-HT.

Output power capacity (max)
- EQX2 10002-SX:11 kVA
- EQX2 8002-HT:8.8 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)
- EQX2 10002-SX:195.5 V
- EQX2 8002-HT:195 V
MPP voltage range
- EQX2 10002-SX:80 - 550 V
- EQX2 8002-HT:200 - 850 V
Maximum input power (DC)
- EQX2 10002-SX:13000 W
- EQX2 8002-HT:12800 W
Maximum power
- EQX2 10002-SX:10000 W
- EQX2 8002-HT:8000 W
DC input voltage
- EQX2 10002-SX:600 V
- EQX2 8002-HT:1000 V
Network voltage
- EQX2 10002-SX:230 V
- EQX2 8002-HT:400 V
Output current
- EQX2 10002-SX:43.5 A
- EQX2 8002-HT:11.8 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EQX2 10002-SX, EQX2 8002-HT
54 specifications	A Salicru EQX2 10002-SX View product	B Salicru EQX2 8002-HT View product
Features16 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs	11 kVA	8.8 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)Differs	195.5 V	195 V
MPP voltage rangeDiffers	80 - 550 V	200 - 850 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs	13000 W	12800 W
Maximum powerDiffers	10000 W	8000 W
DC input voltageDiffers	600 V	1000 V
Network voltageDiffers	230 V	400 V
Output currentDiffers	43.5 A	11.8 A
Power consumption (idle)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs	40 A	18 A
Starting voltageDiffers	80 V	180 V
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs	2	1
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers	2	1
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers	30 A	13 A
Noise levelDiffers	40 dB	25 dB
EfficiencyDiffers	98.1%	98.2%
Efficiency (EU)Known for one	97.6%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for one	99.9%	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Silicon carbide (SiC)	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	Certificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001	EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Design1 differ
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeDiffers	Active	Passive
Built-in fanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Overvoltage categoryKnown for one	CAT II	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	26 kg	28 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons