Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 10002-SX vs Salicru EQX2 3001-S

Add a product
  • 53specifications compared
  • 20differ
  • 33identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 7.7 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 3001-S (11 kVA vs 3.3 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 9,100 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 3001-S (13000 W vs 3900 W). The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 7,000 W more maximum power than the Salicru EQX2 3001-S (10000 W vs 3000 W). MPP voltage range: 80 - 550 V on the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX, 80 - 450 V on the Salicru EQX2 3001-S. Cooling type: Active on the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX, Passive on the Salicru EQX2 3001-S.

  • Output power capacity (max)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:11 kVA
    • EQX2 3001-S:3.3 kVA
  • MPP voltage range
    • EQX2 10002-SX:80 - 550 V
    • EQX2 3001-S:80 - 450 V
  • Maximum input power (DC)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:13000 W
    • EQX2 3001-S:3900 W
  • Maximum power
    • EQX2 10002-SX:10000 W
    • EQX2 3001-S:3000 W
  • DC input voltage
    • EQX2 10002-SX:600 V
    • EQX2 3001-S:500 V
  • Output current
    • EQX2 10002-SX:43.5 A
    • EQX2 3001-S:13 A
  • Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:40 A
    • EQX2 3001-S:15 A
  • Starting voltage
    • EQX2 10002-SX:80 V
    • EQX2 3001-S:60 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of EQX2 10002-SX, EQX2 3001-S
54 specifications
Features14 differ
Product typeOn-grid inverterOn-grid inverter
Output power capacity (max)Differs11 kVA3.3 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)195.5 V195.5 V
Output operation voltage (max)253 V253 V
Output frequency50/60 Hz50/60 Hz
MPP voltage rangeDiffers80 - 550 V80 - 450 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs13000 W3900 W
Maximum powerDiffers10000 W3000 W
DC disconnectorYesYes
DC input voltageDiffers600 V500 V
Isolation typeTransformerlessTransformerless
Network voltage230 V230 V
Number of power levels77
Output currentDiffers43.5 A13 A
Pollution degree2/32/3
Power consumption (idle)1 W1 W
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs40 A15 A
Starting voltageDiffers80 V60 V
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs21
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers21
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers30 A12.5 A
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)3%3%
Power factor0.80.8
Noise levelDiffers40 dB25 dB
EfficiencyDiffers98.1%97.5%
Efficiency (EU)Differs97.6%97%
Efficiency (MPPT)99.9%99.9%
Photovoltaic (PV) charging supportedYesYes
MaterialSilicon carbide (SiC)Silicon carbide (SiC)
CertificationCertificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001Certificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Design1 differ
Product colourBlack, WhiteBlack, White
Housing materialAluminiumAluminium
Cooling typeDiffersActivePassive
Built-in fanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeIP65IP65
Power protection featuresOver voltageOver voltage
Overvoltage categoryCAT IICAT II
Wall mountableYesYes
Easy to installYesYes
Suitable for indoor useYesYes
Suitable for outdoor useYesYes
Displayidentical
Built-in displayYesYes
Display technologyOLEDOLED
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)30 - 60 °C30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)0 - 100%0 - 100%
Operating altitude0 - 4000 m0 - 4000 m
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers550 mm327 mm
DepthDiffers175 mm114 mm
HeightDiffers410 mm297 mm
WeightDiffers26 kg6.5 kg
Chargeridentical
Charger typeMPPTMPPT
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Interface typeMC4MC4
Photovoltaic (PV) inputDiffers62
RS-485 ports11

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons