Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 10002-SX vs Salicru EQX2 3001-HSX

Add a product
  • 46specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 32identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 7.7 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 3001-HSX (11 kVA vs 3.3 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 10002-SX has 0.5 V more output operation voltage (min) than the Salicru EQX2 3001-HSX (195.5 V vs 195 V). The Salicru EQX2 3001-HSX has 20 - 550 V more MPP voltage range than the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX (100 - 550 V vs 80 - 550 V). Cooling type: Active on the Salicru EQX2 10002-SX, Passive on the Salicru EQX2 3001-HSX.

  • Output power capacity (max)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:11 kVA
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:3.3 kVA
  • Output operation voltage (min)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:195.5 V
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:195 V
  • MPP voltage range
    • EQX2 10002-SX:80 - 550 V
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:100 - 550 V
  • Maximum input power (DC)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:13000 W
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:4800 W
  • Maximum power
    • EQX2 10002-SX:10000 W
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:3000 W
  • Output current
    • EQX2 10002-SX:43.5 A
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:13 A
  • Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:40 A
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:20 A
  • Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
    • EQX2 10002-SX:2
    • EQX2 3001-HSX:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of EQX2 10002-SX, EQX2 3001-HSX
54 specifications
Features13 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs11 kVA3.3 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)Differs195.5 V195 V
MPP voltage rangeDiffers80 - 550 V100 - 550 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs13000 W4800 W
Maximum powerDiffers10000 W3000 W
Number of power levelsKnown for one7Unknown — not stated by the source
Output currentDiffers43.5 A13 A
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs40 A20 A
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs21
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers21
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers30 A15 A
Noise levelDiffers40 dB25 dB
EfficiencyDiffers98.1%97.6%
Efficiency (EU)Known for one97.6%Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for one99.9%Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneSilicon carbide (SiC)Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCertificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Design1 differ
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeDiffersActivePassive
Built-in fanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Overvoltage categoryKnown for oneCAT IIUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for one6Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons