Product comparison · 2 smoke detectors

LogiLink SC0013 smoke detector vs LogiLink SC0102 smoke detector Carbon monoxide detector

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 6identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

Certification: EN14604:2005+AC:2008, CE, RoHS on the LogiLink SC0013 smoke detector, EN50291 on the LogiLink SC0102 smoke detector Carbon monoxide detector.

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SC0013, SC0102
21 specifications
Featuresidentical
Test buttonYesYes
Product colourWhiteWhite
Light alarmKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Alarm decibels85 dB85 dB
Maximum rangeKnown for one3 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for oneSurface-mountedUnknown — not stated by the source
Detector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCarbon monoxide detector
Poweridentical
Power sourceBatteryBattery
Battery low indicationYesYes
Battery voltage9 V9 V
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one1 - 95 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersEN14604:2005+AC:2008, CE, RoHSEN50291
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one102 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one36 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one102 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one100 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAlkaline

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More smoke detector comparisons

All smoke detector comparisons