All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 smart card readers

Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black vs Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 1identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel has 227 mm more width than the Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (292 mm vs 65 mm). The Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel has 28 mm more height than the Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (83 mm vs 55 mm). The Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel has 17 mm more depth than the Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (27 mm vs 10 mm). Product colour: Black on the Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black, Platinum on the Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel. Interface: USB 2.0 on the Hama 69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black, USB Type-C on the Kensington Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel.

  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Platinum
  • Interface
    • USB 2.0
    • USB Type-C
  • Width
    • 65 mm
    • 292 mm
  • Height
    • 55 mm
    • 83 mm
  • Depth
    • 10 mm
    • 27 mm
  • Weight
    • 49 g
    • 145 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
27 specifications
A

Hama

69053399 smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black

Model 69053399

View product
B

Kensington

Smart Card (CAC) Reader Adapter for Surface Pro 9 & 10 & Copilot+ PC Surface Pro (11th Edition) with Intel

Model K63244WW

View product
Featuresidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
Compatible productsKnown for oneMicrosoft Surface Pro (9, 10), Surface Pro Copilot+ PC 13"
Product typeKnown for oneUniversal smart card reader
Application areaKnown for oneBanking & payments
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackPlatinum
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Polycarbonate (PC)
Country of originKnown for oneTaiwan
Placement supportedKnown for oneIndoor
LED indicatorsKnown for oneStatus
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 2.0USB Type-C
Poweridentical
Fast chargingKnown for oneYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 80%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-18 - 60 °C
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneIndustry Canada (IC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), REACH, RoHS, WEEE
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Windows 11
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers65 mm292 mm
HeightDiffers55 mm83 mm
DepthDiffers10 mm27 mm
WeightDiffers49 g145 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one315 mm
Package depthKnown for one90 mm
Package heightKnown for one30 mm
Package weightKnown for one168 g
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one10 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More smart card reader comparisons

All smart card reader comparisons