Product comparison · 2 smart card readers

AISENS DNI Smart Card Reader, Black vs Trust 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 4identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The AISENS DNI Smart Card Reader, Black has 10 mm more width than the Trust 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black (76 mm vs 66 mm). The Trust 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black has 34 mm more height than the AISENS DNI Smart Card Reader, Black (85 mm vs 51 mm). The AISENS DNI Smart Card Reader, Black has 38 mm more depth than the Trust 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black (55 mm vs 17 mm). Interface: USB 2.0 on the AISENS DNI Smart Card Reader, Black, USB Type-C on the Trust 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black.

  • Interface
    • DNI Smart Card Reader, Black:USB 2.0
    • 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black:USB Type-C
  • Width
    • DNI Smart Card Reader, Black:76 mm
    • 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black:66 mm
  • Height
    • DNI Smart Card Reader, Black:51 mm
    • 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black:85 mm
  • Depth
    • DNI Smart Card Reader, Black:55 mm
    • 26416 smart card reader Indoor USB USB Type-C Black:17 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ASCR-SN05-BK, 26416
31 specifications
Features1 differ
Product typeUniversal smart card readerUniversal smart card reader
Application areaDiffersAccess control, Public transitGovernment, Banking & payments, Access control
Easy to useKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Placement supportedIndoorIndoor
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 2.0USB Type-C
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneFIPS 201, FIPS TAA, ISO 7816 Class A, B, CUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power sourceUSBUSB
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case volumeKnown for one35532.432 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one393.666 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8Windows 11
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 Mojave, Mac OS X 10.15 Catalina, Mac OS X 10.15.3 Catalina, Mac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 VenturaMac OS X 14.0 Sonoma, Mac OS X 15.0 Sequoia, Mac OS 26 Tahoe
DNIe compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers76 mm66 mm
HeightDiffers51 mm85 mm
DepthDiffers55 mm17 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one98 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one39 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one103 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one119 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one72 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one222 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one513 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one312 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one8.57 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More smart card reader comparisons

All smart card reader comparisons