Product comparison · 2 servers

Acer Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho vs Fujitsu Primergy TX200 S2

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 9identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Processor frequency
    • Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho:3 GHz
    • Primergy TX200 S2:3.2 GHz
  • Internal memory type
    • Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho:DDR2-SDRAM
    • Primergy TX200 S2:DDR-SDRAM
  • Chassis type
    • Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho:Rack (2U)
    • Primergy TX200 S2:Tower
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho:430 x 672 x 87.5 mm
    • Primergy TX200 S2:286 x 775 x 473 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Altos R710/3.0GHz Xeon EM FSB800 CPU 2*512MB DDR II ECC 1x SPS SCSI ho, Primergy TX200 S2
36 specifications
Processor1 differ
Processor familyIntel® Xeon®Intel® Xeon®
Processor frequencyDiffers3 GHz3.2 GHz
Processor cacheKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 MB
Motherboard chipsetIntel® E7320Intel® E7320
Processor cache typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceL2
Maximum number of SMP processors22
Processor front side bus800 MHz800 MHz
Processor manufacturerKnown for oneIntelUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Internal memory1 GB1 GB
Internal memory typeDiffersDDR2-SDRAMDDR-SDRAM
Maximum internal memoryKnown for one12 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
HDD capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source219 GB
HDD interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSCSI
Optical drive typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDVD-ROM
Graphicsidentical
Maximum graphics card memory8 MB8 MB
Networkidentical
Networking featuresEthernet/Fast Ethernet/Gigabit EthernetEthernet/Fast Ethernet/Gigabit Ethernet
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
PS/2 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Parallel ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Serial ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Design1 differ
Chassis typeDiffersRack (2U)Tower
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft: Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise IA32 Edition; Microsoft: Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise x64 Edition; Microsoft Windows 2003 Web Edition Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 Stand./Premium Edition* Microsoft: Windows 2000 Advanced Server; Server Novell: NetWare 6.5 SCO: UnixWare 7.1.4
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceServerStart: ServerBooks CD, ServerSupport CD, ServerView CD
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 W
Power supplyKnown for one700 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source286 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source775 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source473 mm
Weight25 kg25 kg
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs430 x 672 x 87.5 mm286 x 775 x 473 mm
Graphics cardRage XLRage XL
Diskette drive memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.44 MB
RAID controller typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0-Channel 128MB LSI
I/O portsKnown for oneTwo PS/2 ports Serial port (RJ-45 compliant) Three USB ports (one port front accessible) Two Ethernet (RJ-45) ports Two VGA/video ports (one port front accessible)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More server comparisons

All server comparisons