Product comparison · 2 servers

Acer Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW vs Fujitsu Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 6identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

  • Processor frequency
    • Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW:3 GHz
    • Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory:3.4 GHz
  • Internal memory type
    • Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW:DDR-SDRAM
    • Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory:DDR2-SDRAM
  • Maximum internal memory
    • Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW:12 GB
    • Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory:16 GB
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW:430 x 535 x 44 mm
    • Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory:430 x 770 x 44 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Altos R510 RACK 1U Xeon 3000 1GB DVD/CDRW, Primergy RX200 S2 + Memory
36 specifications
Processor1 differ
Processor familyIntel® Xeon®Intel® Xeon®
Processor frequencyDiffers3 GHz3.4 GHz
Motherboard chipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel® E7520
Maximum number of SMP processors22
Processor front side bus800 MHz800 MHz
Processor cacheKnown for one2 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor cache typeKnown for oneL2Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory2 differ
Internal memory1 GB1 GB
Internal memory typeDiffersDDR-SDRAMDDR2-SDRAM
Maximum internal memoryDiffers12 GB16 GB
Storageidentical
HDD capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source146 GB
HDD interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSCSI
Optical drive typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDVD-ROM
RAID levelsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Graphicsidentical
Maximum graphics card memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
Networkidentical
Networking featuresEthernet/Fast Ethernet/Gigabit EthernetEthernet/Fast Ethernet/Gigabit Ethernet
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
PS/2 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Serial ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Expansion slotsKnown for one1 x 64-bit 100 MHz PCI-X (3.3v) 1 x PCI-Express x4Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRack
Software1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers-Microsoft Windows Server 2003 -Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Edition -Novell NetWare 6.5 -Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 -SCO Unixware 7.1.3 -SCO Openserver 5.0.7Microsoft: Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise IA32 Edition; Microsoft: Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise x64 Edition; Microsoft Windows 2003 Web Edition Microsoft: Windows 2000 Advanced Server; Server Novell: NetWare 6.5 SUSE: Enterprise Server 8 for X86 and 9 X86 / EM64T Red Hat: Enterprise Linux 2.
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source480 W
Power supplyKnown for one450 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source430 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source770 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44 mm
Weight16 kg16 kg
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs430 x 535 x 44 mm430 x 770 x 44 mm
Graphics cardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRage XL
Diskette drive memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.44 MB
Storage drive controllerKnown for oneIntegrated dual sATAUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical featuresKnown for oneTelescopic rack kitUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for oneUL/cUL, CB, CE, CCC, Nemko/GSUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More server comparisons

All server comparisons