All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 servers

Acer Altos G330MK2 vs Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX120 S1 + Windows Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition

Add a product
  • 73specifications compared
  • 20differ
  • 53identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

  • Processor family
    • Intel® Pentium®
    • Intel® Xeon®
  • Processor model
    • E2180
    • 3040
  • Processor frequency
    • 2 GHz
    • 1.86 GHz
  • Processor cache
    • 1 MB
    • 2 MB
  • CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)
    • 10
    • 7
  • Number of Processing Die Transistors
    • 105 M
    • 167 M
  • Processing Die size
    • 77 mm²
    • 111 mm²
  • Processor front side bus
    • 800 MHz
    • 1066 MHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
100 specifications
A

Acer

Altos G330MK2View product
B

Fujitsu

PRIMERGY TX120 S1 + Windows Small Business Server 2003 Premium EditionView product
Processor10 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Pentium®Intel® Xeon®
Processor modelDiffersE21803040
Processor frequencyDiffers2 GHz1.86 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers1 MB2 MB
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Differs107
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers105 M167 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers77 mm²111 mm²
Processor codeKnown for oneSLA8Y
Processor front side busDiffers800 MHz1066 MHz
Processor seriesDiffersIntel Pentium E2000 Series for DesktopIntel Xeon 3000 Series
SteppingKnown for oneM0
TcaseDiffers73.3 °C61.4 °C
Physical Address Extension (PAE)Known for one32 bit
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers2 GB1 GB
Memory clock speedDiffers800 MHz667 MHz
Memory slotsKnown for one4x DIMM
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers1 TB0 GB
Number of HDDs installedKnown for one2
HDD capacityKnown for one500 GB
HDD interfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial Attached SCSI (SAS)
RAID levelsKnown for one1, 10
HDD sizeKnown for one2.5"
Optical drive typeKnown for oneDVD-RW
Network1 differ
Networking featuresDiffersGigabit Ehernet10/100/1000 Mbit/s Ethernet
Ports & interfacesidentical
Expansion slotsKnown for one1 x PCIe x8, 1 x PCI-x, 1 x PCI
Expansion slotsidentical
PCI Express x4 slotsKnown for one1
PCI Express x8 slotsKnown for one1
PCI Express x16 slotsKnown for one1
PCI slotsKnown for one2
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one-Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition, -Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, -Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 Edition, -Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition, -Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003, Standard Edition, -Microsoft Windows Small Bu
Processor special features2 differ
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)DiffersNoYes
Processor ARK IDDiffers3173327203
Power1 differ
Redundant power supply (RPS) supportKnown for oneNo
Power supplyDiffers350 W163 W
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 V
Power supply input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for one250 W
Certificates1 differ
SafetyDiffersUL/cUL, Nemko CB/ GS,CE, CCCIEC 60950-1, EN 60950-1, UL 60950-1, CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1
Electromagnetic immunityKnown for oneFCC, CE, BSMI, CCC
Electromagnetic compatibilityKnown for oneEN 55 022 class A, EN 55024, EN61000-3-2 / -3, ETSI EN300386, FCC class A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one185.9 mm
DepthKnown for one479.7 mm
HeightKnown for one424.6 mm
WeightDiffers13.4 kg10 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one10 - 35 °C
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one99 x 399 x 340 mm
Acoustic pressure emissionsKnown for one28 dB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More server comparisons

All server comparisons