Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner vs Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner

Key differences

The Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner has 21.7 W more power consumption (PowerSave) than the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner (23.7 W vs 2 W). The Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner has 548 mm more width than the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner (693 mm vs 145 mm). The Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner has 320 mm more depth than the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner (554 mm vs 234 mm). Only the Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner has built-in display. Maximum scan size: 305 x 10160 mm on the Kodak Alaris S5180 ADF scanner, 105 x 148 mm on the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner.

• Maximum scan size
  • S5180 ADF scanner:305 x 10160 mm
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:105 x 148 mm
• Scanner type
  • S5180 ADF scanner:ADF scanner
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:Flatbed scanner
• Built-in display
  • S5180 ADF scanner:Yes
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:No
• Product colour
  • S5180 ADF scanner:Grey, White
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:Black, Grey
• Sensor type
  • S5180 ADF scanner:CCD
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:CIS
• Light source
  • S5180 ADF scanner:White LED (2x)
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:RGB LED
• Scan drivers
  • S5180 ADF scanner:Kofax VRS, WIA, TWAIN, ISIS
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:ISIS, TWAIN
• Maximum ISO A-series paper size
  • S5180 ADF scanner:A3
  • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:A4