Product comparison · 2 scanners

Kodak Alaris Kodak i5250 ADF scanner vs Kodak Alaris Kodak i5650 ADF scanner

Add a product
  • 43specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 37identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

  • ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:150 ppm
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:180 ppm
  • ADF scan speed (colour, A4)
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:150 ppm
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:180 ppm
  • Daily duty cycle (max)
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:210000 pages
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:250000 pages
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:0.5 W
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:3.5 W
  • Minimum processor
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:Intel Core i5
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:Intel Core i5 2.7 GHz
  • Background colours
    • Kodak i5250 ADF scanner:White
    • Kodak i5650 ADF scanner:Black, White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of i5250, i5650
47 specifications
A

Kodak Alaris

Kodak i5250 ADF scanner

Model i5250

View product
B

Kodak Alaris

Kodak i5650 ADF scanner

Model i5650

View product
Scanning2 differ
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Differs150 ppm180 ppm
ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Differs150 ppm180 ppm
Performance1 differ
Daily duty cycle (max)Differs210000 pages250000 pages
Scan driversKnown for oneISIS, TWAIN, WIAUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Multi feed detectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.5 W3.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 W
System requirements1 differ
Minimum processorDiffersIntel Core i5Intel Core i5 2.7 GHz
Other features1 differ
Background coloursDiffersWhiteBlack, White
Technical detailsidentical
PC connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 2.0

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons