Product comparison · 2 scanners

Kodak Alaris i2600 Sheet-fed scanner vs Kodak Alaris i2800 Sheet-fed scanner

49specifications compared
4differ
45identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)
- i2600 Sheet-fed scanner:50 ppm
- i2800 Sheet-fed scanner:70 ppm
ADF scan speed (colour, A4)
- i2600 Sheet-fed scanner:50 ppm
- i2800 Sheet-fed scanner:60 ppm
Daily duty cycle (max)
- i2600 Sheet-fed scanner:4000 pages
- i2800 Sheet-fed scanner:6000 pages
Standard input capacity
- i2600 Sheet-fed scanner:75 sheets
- i2800 Sheet-fed scanner:100 sheets

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of i2600, i2800
50 specifications	A Kodak Alaris i2600 Sheet-fed scanner Model i2600 View product	B Kodak Alaris i2800 Sheet-fed scanner Model i2800 View product
Scanning2 differ
Maximum scan size	1200 x 1200 mm	1200 x 1200 mm
Optical scanning resolution	600 x 600 DPI	600 x 600 DPI
Colour scanning	Yes	Yes
Input colour depth	48 bit	48 bit
Output colour depth	24 bit	24 bit
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Differs	50 ppm	70 ppm
ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Differs	50 ppm	60 ppm
Designidentical
Scanner type	Sheet-fed scanner	Sheet-fed scanner
Product colour	Black	Black
Display	LCD	LCD
Performance1 differ
Sensor type	CCD	CCD
Light sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RGB LED
Scan file formats	BMP, JPG, PDF, RTF, TIFF	BMP, JPG, PDF, RTF, TIFF
Daily duty cycle (max)Differs	4000 pages	6000 pages
Scan to	File, Image	File, Image
Scan drivers	ISIS, TWAIN, WIA	ISIS, TWAIN, WIA
Scanning noise level	55 dB	55 dB
Input capacity1 differ
Standard input capacityDiffers	75 sheets	100 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper size	A4	A4
Scanning media types supported	Card stock, Plain paper	Card stock, Plain paper
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)	A4, A5	A4, A5
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)	B5	B5
Legal	Yes	Yes
Letter	Yes	Yes
Auto Document Feeder (ADF) media weight	34 - 413 g/m²	34 - 413 g/m²
Maximum scan area (ADF)	215.9 x 4064 mm	215.9 x 4064 mm
Minimum scan area (ADF)	50.8 x 63.5 mm	50.8 x 63.5 mm
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB port	Yes	Yes
USB version	2.0	2.0
Standard interfaces	USB 2.0	USB 2.0
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)	32 W	32 W
Power consumption (standby)	4 W	4 W
AC input frequency	50 - 60 Hz	50 - 60 Hz
Input voltage	100-240 V	100-240 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width	330 mm	330 mm
Depth	160 mm	160 mm
Height	246 mm	246 mm
Weight	5.44 kg	5.44 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled software	KODAK Capture Desktop	KODAK Capture Desktop
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificates	ENERGY STAR	ENERGY STAR
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systems	Windows 7 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows VISTA SP1 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows XP SP2/SP3 (32-bit) Windows XP x64 SP2 Windows 2008 Server x64 Linux Ubuntu 10.04.1	Windows 7 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows VISTA SP1 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows XP SP2/SP3 (32-bit) Windows XP x64 SP2 Windows 2008 Server x64 Linux Ubuntu 10.04.1
Linux operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Mac compatibility	No	No
Minimum RAM	2024 MB	2024 MB
Minimum processor	Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz	Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz
USB required	Yes	Yes
Windows operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	50 - 95 °F	50 - 95 °F
Operating relative humidity (H-H)	10 - 76%	10 - 76%
Other featuresidentical
Certification	AS/NZS 3548 Class B (C-Tick Mark), CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1-07 (C-UL Mark), Canada ICES-003 Issue 4 (Class B), GB4943, GB9254 (Class B), GB 17625.1 Harmonics (CCC “S&E” Mark), EN 55022 ITE Emissions (Class B), EN 61000-3-3 Flicker, EN 55024 ITE Immunity (CE Mark), EN 60950-1 2nd ed. (TUV GS Mark),	AS/NZS 3548 Class B (C-Tick Mark), CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1-07 (C-UL Mark), Canada ICES-003 Issue 4 (Class B), GB4943, GB9254 (Class B), GB 17625.1 Harmonics (CCC “S&E” Mark), EN 55022 ITE Emissions (Class B), EN 61000-3-3 Flicker, EN 55024 ITE Immunity (CE Mark), EN 60950-1 2nd ed. (TUV GS Mark),

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons