Product comparison · 2 scanners

Kodak Alaris i1220 Sheet-fed scanner vs Kodak Alaris i1410 Sheet-fed scanner

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 11identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

  • Weight
    • i1220 Sheet-fed scanner:5.5 kg
    • i1410 Sheet-fed scanner:8.9 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • i1220 Sheet-fed scanner:330 x 162 x 246 mm
    • i1410 Sheet-fed scanner:547 x 300 x 236 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of i1220, i1410
23 specifications
A

Kodak Alaris

i1220 Sheet-fed scanner

Model i1220

View product
B

Kodak Alaris

i1410 Sheet-fed scanner

Model i1410

View product
Scanningidentical
Flatbed scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one2 sec/pageUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Scan file formatsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePDF, RTF, TIFF
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one40 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers5.5 kg8.9 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffers- TWAIN & ISIS drivers - Kodak Capture Software, Lite - Nuance ScanSoft OmniPage 14 & PaperPort 10-TWAIN, ISIS and WINDOWS Imaging Architecture Drivers -KODAK Capture Software, Lite
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows XP SP2; XP; 2000 ProfessionalUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs330 x 162 x 246 mm547 x 300 x 236 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one100–240 V; 50-60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Input capacityidentical
Standard input capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 sheets
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons