Product comparison · 2 scanners

Kodak Alaris i1220 Plus Scanner vs Kodak Alaris Picture Saver PS410

20specifications compared
6differ
14identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Scanner type
- i1220 Plus Scanner:Flatbed & ADF scanner
- Picture Saver PS410:Sheet-fed scanner
Power consumption (typical)
- i1220 Plus Scanner:35 W
- Picture Saver PS410:46 W
Minimum processor
- i1220 Plus Scanner:Intel Core2, 2 GHz Duo
- Picture Saver PS410:Intel Core2 Duo, 2 GHz
Media thickness (imperial)
- i1220 Plus Scanner:0.05"
- Picture Saver PS410:0.5"

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of i1220 Plus Scanner, Picture Saver PS410
39 specifications	A Kodak Alaris i1220 Plus Scanner View product	B Kodak Alaris Picture Saver PS410 View product
Scanningidentical
Input colour depthKnown for one	48 bit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Greyscale levelsKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Scanner typeDiffers	Flatbed & ADF scanner	Sheet-fed scanner
Performanceidentical
Maximum duty cycleKnown for one	90000 pages per month	Unknown — not stated by the source
Scan file formatsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	BMP, PDF, RTF, TIFF
Input capacityidentical
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityKnown for one	75 sheets	Unknown — not stated by the source
Standard input capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for one	A3	Unknown — not stated by the source
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for one	A3, A4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	35 W	46 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 W
Packaging content1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffers	TWAIN, ISIS, WIA Drivers; KODAK Capture Desktop Software, Smart Touch; Nuance ScanSoft PaperPort, OmniPage.	KODAK Picture Saver Scanning, Smart Touch, TWAIN
System requirements2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows XP SP2/SP3 (32-bit), Windows XP x64 edition SP2, Windows Vista SP1 (32-bit / 64-bit), Windows 7 (32-bit / 64-bit), Windows 2003 Server/2008 Server/x64, Linux Ubuntu 8.04, Fedora 9, SUSE 11	Windows XP SP3 / x64 SP2, Windows Vista SP2 / x64 SP2, Windows 7 x32 / x64
Minimum processorDiffers	Intel Core2, 2 GHz Duo	Intel Core2 Duo, 2 GHz
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	10 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	17 - 76%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	330 x 162 x 246 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
IlluminationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Media thickness (imperial)Differs	0.05"	0.5"
Scan media weightKnown for one	34 - 413 g/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240V, 50-60 Hz
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AS/NZS 3548 B (C-Tick Mark), CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1 (C-UL Mark), Canada ICES-003 4 B, GB4943, GB9254 B, GB 17625.1 Harmonics (CCC "S&E" Mark), EN 55022 ITE B, EN 61000-3-3, EN 55024 ITE, EN 60950 (CE Mark), IEC 60950, CISPR 22 B, VCCI (B), CNS 13438 (B), (BSMI Mark), UL 60950-1 (UL Mark), CFR 47
Acoustic pressure emissionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 dB
Recommended media weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34 - 413 g/m²

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons