Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner vs Ricoh FI-70F Flatbed scanner

Key differences

The Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner has 14 W more power consumption (typical) than the Ricoh FI-70F Flatbed scanner (20 W vs 6 W). The Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner has 167 mm more width than the Ricoh FI-70F Flatbed scanner (312 mm vs 145 mm). The Ricoh FI-70F Flatbed scanner has 30 mm more depth than the Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner (234 mm vs 204 mm). Only the Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner has built-in display. Maximum scan size: 216 x 3000 mm on the Kodak Alaris Kodak E1040 ADF scanner, 105 x 148 mm on the Ricoh FI-70F Flatbed scanner.

• Maximum scan size
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:216 x 3000 mm
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:105 x 148 mm
• Scanner type
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:ADF scanner
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:Flatbed scanner
• Built-in display
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:Yes
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:No
• Product colour
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:Black, White
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:Black
• Maximum ISO A-series paper size
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:A4
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:A6
• Power consumption (typical)
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:20 W
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:6 W
• Width
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:312 mm
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:145 mm
• Depth
  • Kodak E1040 ADF scanner:204 mm
  • FI-70F Flatbed scanner:234 mm