Product comparison · 2 scanners

Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N - vs Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 13identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner has 0.2 W more power consumption (off) than the Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N - (0.5 W vs 0.3 W). The Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N - has 153 mm more width than the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner (298 mm vs 145 mm). The Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner has 99 mm more depth than the Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N - (234 mm vs 135 mm). Only the Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N - has duplex scanning. Maximum scan size: 216 x 355.6 mm on the Fujitsu Scanner modelo SP-1120N -, 105 x 148 mm on the Ricoh fi-65F Flatbed scanner.

  • Maximum scan size
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:216 x 355.6 mm
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:105 x 148 mm
  • Duplex scanning
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:Yes
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:No
  • Scanner type
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:ADF scanner
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:Flatbed scanner
  • Product colour
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:Grey
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:Black, Grey
  • Sensor type
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:CMOS dual CIS
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:CIS
  • USB version
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:2.0
  • Power supply type
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:AC
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:AC/USB
  • Power consumption (off)
    • Scanner modelo SP-1120N -:0.3 W
    • fi-65F Flatbed scanner:0.5 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Scanner modelo SP-1120N -, fi-65F
57 specifications
Scanning2 differ
Maximum scan sizeDiffers216 x 355.6 mm105 x 148 mm
Optical scanning resolution600 x 600 DPI600 x 600 DPI
Colour scanningYesYes
Duplex scanningDiffersYesNo
Output colour depth24 bit24 bit
Output greyscale depthKnown for one8 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
Output monochrome depthKnown for one1 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one20 ppmUnknown — not stated by the source
Duplex ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one40 ipmUnknown — not stated by the source
Duplex ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Known for one40 ipmUnknown — not stated by the source
Film scanningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Black/white scanning colour modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGrayscale, Monochrome
Design2 differ
Scanner typeDiffersADF scannerFlatbed scanner
Built-in displayNoNo
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack, Grey
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeDiffersCMOS dual CISCIS
Light sourceRGB LEDRGB LED
Scan file formatsKnown for onePDFUnknown — not stated by the source
Daily duty cycle (max)Known for one3000 pagesUnknown — not stated by the source
Scan driversISIS, TWAINISIS, TWAIN
Input capacityidentical
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityKnown for one50 sheetsUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeA4A4
Long-paper modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Multi feed detectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LetterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Card thickness (max)Known for one0.76 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto Document Feeder (ADF) media weightKnown for one50 - 209 g/m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum scan area (ADF)Known for one52 x 74 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceA6
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB portYesYes
USB versionDiffers3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)2.0
Standard interfacesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 2.0
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for one18 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeDiffersACAC/USB
Power consumption (off)Differs0.3 W0.5 W
Sleep modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Input voltage100-240 V100-240 V
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Power supplyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers298 mm145 mm
DepthDiffers135 mm234 mm
HeightDiffers133 mm40 mm
WeightDiffers2.5 kg900 g
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
System requirements2 differ
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedDiffersWindows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 x64, Windows Server 2008 x64, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2 x64, Windows Server 2012 x64, Windows Server 2016 x64
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Wind
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)5 - 35 °C5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)20 - 80%20 - 80%
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesRoHSRoHS
Background coloursKnown for oneWhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Scan timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.7 s
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePaperStream IP PaperStream Capture Software Operation Panel
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84716070

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons