Product comparison · 2 scanners

Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner vs Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400

33specifications compared
15differ
18identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner has 25 ppm more ADF scan speed (b/w, A4) than the Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400 (70 ppm vs 45 ppm). The Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner has 15 W more power consumption (typical) than the Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400 (28 W vs 13 W). The Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner has 285 mm more width than the Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400 (577 mm vs 292 mm). Only the Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner has built-in display. Maximum scan size: 215.9 x 355.6 mm on the Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner, 216 x 316 mm on the Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400.

Maximum scan size
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:215.9 x 355.6 mm
- ScanSnap iX2400:216 x 316 mm
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:70 ppm
- ScanSnap iX2400:45 ppm
Scanner type
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:ADF + Manual feed scanner
- ScanSnap iX2400:ADF scanner
Built-in display
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:Yes
- ScanSnap iX2400:No
Product colour
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:Grey
- ScanSnap iX2400:Black
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:B5, B6
- ScanSnap iX2400:B4, B5, B6
Paper tray media weight
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:20 - 465 g/m²
- ScanSnap iX2400:40 - 209 g/m²
USB version
- FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
- ScanSnap iX2400:2.0/3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FI-8270, ScanSnap iX2400
47 specifications	A Fujitsu FI-8270 scanner ADF + Manual feed scanner Model FI-8270 View product	B Ricoh ScanSnap iX2400 View product
Scanning2 differ
Maximum scan sizeDiffers	215.9 x 355.6 mm	216 x 316 mm
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Differs	70 ppm	45 ppm
Black/white scanning colour modesKnown for one	Grayscale, Monochrome	Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour scanningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Design3 differ
Scanner typeDiffers	ADF + Manual feed scanner	ADF scanner
Built-in displayDiffers	Yes	No
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Black
Control typeKnown for one	Buttons	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Light sourceKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Scan file formatsKnown for one	JPEG, PDF, PNG, TIFF	Unknown — not stated by the source
Scan driversKnown for one	ISIS, TWAIN	Unknown — not stated by the source
Scanner smart software featuresKnown for one	Blank page detection	Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper handling2 differ
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)Differs	B5, B6	B4, B5, B6
ID-cards (ISO/IEC 7810) compliantKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Card thickness (max)Known for one	1.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper tray media weightDiffers	20 - 465 g/m²	40 - 209 g/m²
Multi feed detectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB versionDiffers	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	2.0/3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-B	USB Type-A, USB Type-C
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	28 W	13 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	577 mm	292 mm
DepthDiffers	234 mm	161 mm
HeightDiffers	300 mm	159 mm
WeightDiffers	8.8 kg	3.2 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	15 - 80%	20 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons