Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon SmartLF Gx+T 42c vs Kodak Alaris i5200V Scanner

20specifications compared
12differ
8identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Optical scanning resolution
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:1200 x 1200 DPI
- i5200V Scanner:600 x 600 DPI
Product colour
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:Black
- i5200V Scanner:Black, White
USB version
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:2.0
- i5200V Scanner:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Power consumption (typical)
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:72 W
- i5200V Scanner:205 W
Power consumption (standby)
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:4.5 W
- i5200V Scanner:5.5 W
Width
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:1140 mm
- i5200V Scanner:693 mm
Depth
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:180 mm
- i5200V Scanner:653 mm
Height
- SmartLF Gx+T 42c:370 mm
- i5200V Scanner:434 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SmartLF Gx+T 42c, i5200V Scanner
39 specifications	A Canon SmartLF Gx+T 42c View product	B Kodak Alaris i5200V Scanner View product
Scanning1 differ
Maximum scan sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	304.8 x 1000 mm
Optical scanning resolutionDiffers	1200 x 1200 DPI	600 x 600 DPI
Duplex scanningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input colour depthKnown for one	48 bit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Scanner typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ADF scanner
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Black	Black, White
Performanceidentical
Light sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White LED
Scan file formatsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	JPG, PDF, RTF, TIFF
Daily duty cycle (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200000 pages
Scanning noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 dB
Input capacityidentical
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A3
Multi feed detectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto Document Feeder (ADF) media weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 - 200 g/m²
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB versionDiffers	2.0	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Standard interfacesDiffers	Ethernet, USB 2.0	USB 2.0, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	72 W	205 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	4.5 W	5.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	1140 mm	693 mm
DepthDiffers	180 mm	653 mm
HeightDiffers	370 mm	434 mm
WeightDiffers	44 kg	57.6 kg
System requirements1 differ
Minimum RAMKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4000 MB
Minimum processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Intel® Core™ Quad, 3GHz
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 Enterprise, Windows 8 Enterprise x64, Win	Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	CB, CE, CCC, FCC, UL, RoHS	EPEAT
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	10 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	35 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons