Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP vs Canon LiDE 100

11specifications compared
9differ
2identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum scan size
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:216 x 355 mm
- LiDE 100:216 x 297 mm
Input colour depth
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:24 bit
- LiDE 100:48 bit
Scanner type
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:Sheet-fed scanner
- LiDE 100:Flatbed scanner
Sensor type
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:CMOS CIS
- LiDE 100:CIS
Power consumption (typical)
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:26 W
- LiDE 100:2.5 W
Weight
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:3.4 kg
- LiDE 100:1.6 kg
Mac compatibility
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:No
- LiDE 100:Yes
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP:310 x 234 x 158 mm
- LiDE 100:250 x 370 x 40 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP, LiDE 100
27 specifications	A Canon imageFORMULA ScanFront 220eP View product	B Canon LiDE 100 View product
Scanning2 differ
Maximum scan sizeDiffers	216 x 355 mm	216 x 297 mm
Optical scanning resolutionKnown for one	600 x 600 DPI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input colour depthDiffers	24 bit	48 bit
Greyscale levelsKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flatbed scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14 sec/page
Design1 differ
Scanner typeDiffers	Sheet-fed scanner	Flatbed scanner
DisplayKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeDiffers	CMOS CIS	CIS
Light sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RGB LED
Input capacityidentical
Standard input capacityKnown for one	50 sheets	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	26 W	2.5 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	3.4 kg	1.6 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for one	eCopy ShareScan, eCopy Quick Connect, eCopy Desktop	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP3, Vista Business/Enterprise SP1, 2003 Server, 2008 Server	Windows Vista, XP SP2, 2000, Mac OS X v.10.3.9, v.10.4,v.10.5
Mac compatibilityDiffers	No	Yes
Minimum RAMKnown for one	512 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one	Intel Pentium 4, 2.4GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Network readyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	310 x 234 x 158 mm	250 x 370 x 40 mm
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0
Standard interfacesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 2.0
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons