Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner vs Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner

Add a product
  • 28specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 11identical
  • 54known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner has 20 ipm more duplex ADF scan speed (b/w, A4) than the Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner (100 ipm vs 80 ipm). The Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner has 3,000 pages more daily duty cycle (max) than the Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner (9000 pages vs 6000 pages). The Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner has 10 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner (60 sheets vs 50 sheets). Scanner type: ADF scanner on the Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner, ADF + Manual feed scanner on the Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner. Product colour: Black on the Canon imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner, Black, Grey on the Ricoh FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner.

  • Duplex ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:100 ipm
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:80 ipm
  • Scanner type
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:ADF scanner
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:ADF + Manual feed scanner
  • Product colour
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:Black
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:Black, Grey
  • Sensor type
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:CIS
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:Dual CIS
  • Daily duty cycle (max)
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:9000 pages
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:6000 pages
  • Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:60 sheets
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:50 sheets
  • Card thickness (max)
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:0.3 mm
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:0.76 mm
  • USB version
    • imageFORMULA DR-S350NW Driveless USB & Networking document scanner:2.0
    • FI-8040 ADF + Manual feed scanner:2.0/3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DR-S350NW, FI-8040
82 specifications
Scanning1 differ
Maximum scan sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 x 297 mm
Output colour depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 bit
Output monochrome depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 bit
ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 ppm
Duplex ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Differs100 ipm80 ipm
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one50 ppmUnknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Scanner typeDiffersADF scannerADF + Manual feed scanner
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Grey
TouchscreenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTouch
DisplayKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Sensor typeDiffersCISDual CIS
Light sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRGB LED
Daily duty cycle (max)Differs9000 pages6000 pages
Scan driversKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceISIS, SANE, TWAIN
Ultrasonic sensorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Scanner smart software featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBackground purifying, Blank page detection
Scan toKnown for oneFTPUnknown — not stated by the source
Input capacity1 differ
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityDiffers60 sheets50 sheets
Paper handling1 differ
Scanning media types supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness Card, Plain paper, Plastic Card, Post Card(JPN)
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceA4, A5, A6
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceB5, B6
LegalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LetterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Card thickness (max)Differs0.3 mm0.76 mm
Paper tray media weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 - 209 g/m²
Media thickness (min)Known for one0.04 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum scan widthKnown for one21.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum scan lengthKnown for one35.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB versionDiffers2.02.0/3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Socket connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceC7
USB connector typeKnown for oneUSB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source19 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.15 W
AC input frequencyDiffers50 - 60 Hz50/60 Hz
Input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V100 - 240 V
Power consumption (sleep)Differs2 W1.9 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.3 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers291 mm292 mm
DepthDiffers267 mm157 mm
HeightDiffers242 mm143 mm
WeightDiffers3.4 kg3.1 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC, USB
Packaging contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceADF paper chute, AC adapter, Setup DVD-ROM
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEATENERGY STAR
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
System requirementsidentical
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10, Windows 11
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 32.5 °C5 - 35 °C
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Background coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWhite
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Cardboard packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 kg
Foil packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 g
Glass packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8471607000
Metal packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g
Pallet gross lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source101.6 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source121.9 cm
Pallet height (air)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source130.4 cm
Pallet height (sea)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source199 cm
Paper packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 kg
Plastic packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 g
Polystyrene (EPS/EPP) packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 g
Products per pallet (air)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 pc(s)
Products per pallet (sea)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source96 pc(s)
Wood packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons