Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner vs Canon SMARTLF SC 36M

15specifications compared
11differ
4identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

Colour scanning
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:Yes
- SMARTLF SC 36M:No
Input colour depth
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:24 bit
- SMARTLF SC 36M:16 bit
Product colour
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:White
- SMARTLF SC 36M:Grey
Sensor type
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:CMOS
- SMARTLF SC 36M:CIS
USB version
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:2.0
- SMARTLF SC 36M:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Standard interfaces
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:USB 2.0
- SMARTLF SC 36M:USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Power consumption (typical)
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:95 W
- SMARTLF SC 36M:53 W
Width
- imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner:480 mm
- SMARTLF SC 36M:1148 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DR-G1130, SMARTLF SC 36M
38 specifications	A Canon imageFORMULA DR-G1130 ADF scanner Model DR-G1130 View product	B Canon SMARTLF SC 36M View product
Scanning2 differ
Maximum scan sizeKnown for one	304.8 x 431.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical scanning resolutionKnown for one	600 x 600 DPI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour scanningDiffers	Yes	No
Duplex scanningKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input colour depthDiffers	24 bit	16 bit
ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one	130 ppm	Unknown — not stated by the source
ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Known for one	130 ppm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Duplex ADF scan speed (b/w, A4)Known for one	200 ipm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Duplex ADF scan speed (colour, A4)Known for one	200 ipm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Scanner typeKnown for one	ADF scanner	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	White	Grey
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeDiffers	CMOS	CIS
Light sourceKnown for one	RGB LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Daily duty cycle (max)Known for one	30000 pages	Unknown — not stated by the source
Scan driversKnown for one	ISIS, TWAIN	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input capacityidentical
Standard input capacityKnown for one	500 sheets	Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for one	A3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB versionDiffers	2.0	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Standard interfacesDiffers	USB 2.0	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	95 W	53 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	1.6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	480 mm	1148 mm
DepthDiffers	536 mm	152 mm
HeightDiffers	315 mm	381 mm
WeightDiffers	22.7 kg	24 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Drivers includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 Enterprise, Windows 8 Enterprise x64, Win
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35 - 80 °C
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CB, CE, CCC, FCC, UL

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons