Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner vs Canon Scanfront 300P

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 7identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum scan size
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:216 x 297 mm
    • Scanfront 300P:216 x 1000 mm
  • Optical scanning resolution
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:4800 x 9600 DPI
    • Scanfront 300P:600 x 600 DPI
  • Input colour depth
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:48 bit
    • Scanfront 300P:24 bit
  • Film scanning
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:Yes
    • Scanfront 300P:No
  • Greyscale levels
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:16
    • Scanfront 300P:256
  • Scanner type
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:Flatbed scanner
    • Scanfront 300P:Sheet-fed scanner
  • Sensor type
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:CCD
    • Scanfront 300P:CMOS CIS
  • ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)
    • CanoScan 5600F Flatbed scanner:A4, A5, A6
    • Scanfront 300P:A4

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 5600F, Scanfront 300P
43 specifications
Scanning5 differ
Maximum scan sizeDiffers216 x 297 mm216 x 1000 mm
Optical scanning resolutionDiffers4800 x 9600 DPI600 x 600 DPI
Colour scanningYesYes
Duplex scanningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input colour depthDiffers48 bit24 bit
Film scanningDiffersYesNo
Greyscale levelsDiffers16256
Design1 differ
Scanner typeDiffersFlatbed scannerSheet-fed scanner
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack, Grey, Silver
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeDiffersCCDCMOS CIS
Light sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRGB LED
Daily duty cycle (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3000 pages
Input capacityidentical
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 sheets
Paper handling1 differ
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeA4A4
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)DiffersA4, A5, A6A4
LetterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portYesYes
USB version2.02.0
Standard interfacesUSB 2.0USB 2.0
Networkidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSMTP
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs19 W29 W
Power supply typeACAC
Power consumption (standby)Known for one3.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.4 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers272 mm310 mm
DepthDiffers491 mm160 mm
HeightDiffers97 mm221 mm
WeightDiffers4.3 kg3.58 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
System requirements2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows Vista, XP, 2000 Mac OS X v.10.3.9- 10.5.xWindows 2000/XP Pro/ XP Home/Vista/7
Mac compatibilityDiffersYesNo
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneInternet Explorer 6.0, CD-ROM, 1024 x 768 pxUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs50 - 95 °F10 - 32.5 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 80%
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source310 x 160 x 221 mm
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 - 240V
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Scan timeKnown for one11 sUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Drivers includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bundled softwareKnown for oneScanGear, MP Navigator EX, ArcSoft PhotoStudioUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons