Product comparison · 2 scanners

Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner vs Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 8identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner has 40 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey (60 sheets vs 20 sheets). The Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner has 12 W more power consumption (typical) than the Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey (25 W vs 13 W). The Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner has 0.89 kg more weight than the Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey (2.7 kg vs 1.81 kg). Maximum scan size: 51 x 5000 mm on the Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner, 215.9 x 5588 mm on the Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey. Scanner type: ADF scanner on the Brother ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner, Sheet-fed scanner on the Epson DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey.

  • Maximum scan size
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:51 x 5000 mm
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:215.9 x 5588 mm
  • Scanner type
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:ADF scanner
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:Sheet-fed scanner
  • Product colour
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:White
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:Black, Grey
  • Display diagonal
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:6.86 cm (2.7")
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:6.1 cm (2.4")
  • Sensor type
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:Dual CIS
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:CIS
  • Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:60 sheets
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:20 sheets
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:25 W
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:13 W
  • Power supply type
    • ADS-3350W scanner ADF scanner:AC
    • DS-C480W Sheet-fed scanner Black, Grey:USB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ADS-3350W, DS-C480W
57 specifications
Scanning1 differ
Maximum scan sizeDiffers51 x 5000 mm215.9 x 5588 mm
Optical scanning resolutionKnown for one600 x 600 DPIUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour scanningKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Input colour depthKnown for one48 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
Output colour depthKnown for one24 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
Greyscale levelsKnown for one256Unknown — not stated by the source
Roller lifetimeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50000 pages
Design3 differ
Scanner typeDiffersADF scannerSheet-fed scanner
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack, Grey
DisplayKnown for oneTFTUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalDiffers6.86 cm (2.7")6.1 cm (2.4")
TouchscreenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTouch
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeDiffersDual CISCIS
Scan toKnown for oneE-mail, E-mail Server, OCR, Image, File, FTP, USB, Network folder, CloudUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one512 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Light sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Daily duty cycle (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5000 pages
Input capacity1 differ
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityDiffers60 sheets20 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for oneA3Unknown — not stated by the source
Scanning media types supportedKnown for onePlain paper, Thin paper, Thick paper, Business Card, Recycled paper, Plastic CardUnknown — not stated by the source
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for oneA3, A4Unknown — not stated by the source
LegalKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LetterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Media thickness (min)Known for one0.25 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Card thickness (max)Known for one1.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper tray media weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 - 413 g/m²
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA-AES, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK, WPA2-AES, WPA3Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs25 W13 W
Power supply typeDiffersACUSB
AC input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one300 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one216 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one191 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers2.7 kg1.81 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 10.14 Mojave, Mac OS X 10.15 Catalina, Mac OS X 11.0 Big SurYes
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows Server 2016, Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2019Unknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11Yes
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 80%15 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 60 °C
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIndonesia

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons