Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker vs Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker

15specifications compared
4differ
11identical
33known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker has 2.2 L more volume than the Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker (4 L vs 1.8 L). The Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker has 314 W more power than the Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker (1250 W vs 936 W). AC input frequency: 50 Hz on the Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker, 50-60 Hz on the Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker. AC input voltage: 220 V on the Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker, 220-240 V on the Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker.

Volume
- HD4539/50 rice cooker:4 L
- 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker:1.8 L
Power
- HD4539/50 rice cooker:1250 W
- 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker:936 W
AC input frequency
- HD4539/50 rice cooker:50 Hz
- 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker:50-60 Hz
AC input voltage
- HD4539/50 rice cooker:220 V
- 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker:220-240 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HD4539/50, HD4814/31
48 specifications	A Philips HD4539/50 rice cooker Model HD4539/50 View product	B Philips 5000 series HD4814/31 rice cooker Model HD4814/31 View product
Features1 differ
VolumeDiffers	4 L	1.8 L
Steam cookingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Preset cooking programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Keep warm functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Keep warm function timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 h
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Automatic programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 m
Hinged lidKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stainless steel
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Steam tray for healthy cookingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal coatingKnown for one	Ceramic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital timerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ready indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers	1250 W	936 W
AC input frequencyDiffers	50 Hz	50-60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	220 V	220-240 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	273 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	367 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	255 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.62 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	337 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	432 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	305 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.15 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Recipe bookKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Spoon includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Rice scoopKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SpatulaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PVC/BFR, Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
Control panel colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one	1250 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons