Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker vs Sogo ARR-10065 rice cooker

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 2identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Sogo ARR-10065 rice cooker has 0.96 L more volume than the Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker (1.5 L vs 0.54 L). The Sogo ARR-10065 rice cooker has 64 W more power than the Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker (500 W vs 436 W). The Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker has 25.2 mm more width than the Sogo ARR-10065 rice cooker (225.2 mm vs 200 mm). Only the Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker has built-in display. Product colour: Black on the Philips 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker, White on the Sogo ARR-10065 rice cooker.

  • Product colour
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:Black
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:White
  • Volume
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:0.54 L
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:1.5 L
  • Built-in display
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:Yes
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:No
  • Control type
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:Buttons
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:Lever
  • Power
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:436 W
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:500 W
  • Width
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:225.2 mm
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:200 mm
  • Depth
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:242.5 mm
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:250 mm
  • Height
    • 3000 series HD3091/80 rice cooker:189.8 mm
    • ARR-10065 rice cooker:270 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of HD3091/80, ARR-10065
40 specifications
Features4 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
VolumeDiffers0.54 L1.5 L
Non-stick coatingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayDiffersYesNo
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Preset cooking programsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of cooking programsKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source
Keep warm functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffersButtonsLever
Stop/cancel buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital timerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one0.9 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Detachable lidKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
One-touch operationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Steam cookingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Handle(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers436 W500 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers225.2 mm200 mm
DepthDiffers242.5 mm250 mm
HeightDiffers189.8 mm270 mm
WeightDiffers1.67 kg2 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers265 mm270 mm
Package depthDiffers300 mm270 mm
Package heightDiffers225 mm290 mm
Package weightKnown for one3.12 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Recipe bookKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
SpatulaKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Spoon includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Steaming basketKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons