Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker vs Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker

15specifications compared
7differ
8identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker has 8 more cooking programs than the Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker (16 vs 8). The Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker has 36 h more keep warm function time than the Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker (48 h vs 12 h). The Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker has 146 mm more width than the Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker (367 mm vs 221 mm). Product colour: Pink, White on the Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker, Green on the Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker. AC input frequency: 50 Hz on the Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker, 50/60 Hz on the Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker.

Product colour
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:Pink, White
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:Green
Number of cooking programs
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:8
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:16
Keep warm function time
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:12 h
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:48 h
AC input frequency
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:50 Hz
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:50/60 Hz
Width
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:221 mm
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:367 mm
Depth
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:258 mm
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:273 mm
Height
- 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker:197 mm
- 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker:255 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HD3072, HD4716/32
36 specifications	A Philips 3000 series HD3072 rice cooker Model HD3072 View product	B Philips 3000 series HD4716/32 rice cooker Model HD4716/32 View product
Features3 differ
Product colourDiffers	Pink, White	Green
Volume	1.8 L	1.8 L
Built-in displayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Preset cooking programs	Yes	Yes
Number of cooking programsDiffers	8	16
Keep warm functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Keep warm function timeDiffers	12 h	48 h
Control typeKnown for one	Touch	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	0.9 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable lidKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable power cordKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multi-menu selectionsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Steam cookingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-stick coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Internal coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bakuhanseki
Automatic keep warmKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Handle(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Power1 differ
Power	400 W	400 W
AC input frequencyDiffers	50 Hz	50/60 Hz
AC input voltage	220 V	220 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	221 mm	367 mm
DepthDiffers	258 mm	273 mm
HeightDiffers	197 mm	255 mm
WeightKnown for one	2.4 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	3.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Measuring cup	Yes	Yes
SpatulaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Spoon includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Steaming basketKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Country of origin	China	China
Warranty period	2 year(s)	2 year(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goods	No	No
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100%
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	400 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons