Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker vs Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 9identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker has 0.31 L more volume than the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker (0.85 L vs 0.54 L). The Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker has 253 W more power than the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker (653 W vs 400 W). Product colour: White, Pink on the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker, Black, Silver on the Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker. AC input frequency: 50 Hz on the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker, 50/60 Hz on the Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker. AC input voltage: 220-240 V on the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker, 220-240ac on the Philips HD3093/80 rice cooker.

  • Product colour
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:White, Pink
    • HD3093/80 rice cooker:Black, Silver
  • Volume
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:0.54 L
    • HD3093/80 rice cooker:0.85 L
  • Power
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:400 W
    • HD3093/80 rice cooker:653 W
  • AC input frequency
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:50 Hz
    • HD3093/80 rice cooker:50/60 Hz
  • AC input voltage
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:220-240 V
    • HD3093/80 rice cooker:220-240ac

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HD3064/62, HD3093/80
41 specifications
A

Philips

HD3064/62 rice cooker

Model HD3064/62

View product
B

Philips

HD3093/80 rice cooker

Model HD3093/80

View product
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffersWhite, PinkBlack, Silver
VolumeDiffers0.54 L0.85 L
Built-in displayYesYes
Number of cooking programsKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Automatic keep warmKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Keep warm functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Keep warm function timeKnown for one12 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeButtonsButtons
Cord length0.8 m0.8 m
Detachable lidKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Detachable power cordKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Removable bowlYesYes
Cooking menus quantityKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable and washable inner lidKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy-to-clean non-stick inner potKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Fuzzy Logic controlsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Plastic steam trayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ready indicatorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers400 W653 W
AC input frequencyDiffers50 Hz50/60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers220-240 V220-240ac
Packaging contentidentical
Measuring cupYesYes
Rice scoopKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
SpatulaYesYes
Other featuresidentical
Country of originChinaChina
Warranty period2 year(s)2 year(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsNoNo
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one90%Unknown — not stated by the source
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source251 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source363 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.67 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source284 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source403 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source246 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons